Re: [Rats] draft-frost-rats-eat-collection-01 ... RE: Request for review and interest

Hi Hannes,

On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 3:07 PM Hannes Tschofenig
<Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com> wrote:
> This document is simple but useful because it allows us to bundle two or more EAT tokens together.
>
> One application of this document is in draft-fossati-tls-attestation.
>
> Hence, I support this document.

I agree it is a useful construct that can be repurposed for our
attested TLS prototype.  In general, it seems like a good match for
cases where two pieces of evidence must fit together -- for example,
Eric noticed it could be also used as a building block for ar4si's
AR-augmented evidence.

(Maybe the two use cases above could be added to §2.)

One observation.  The evidence binding mechanism is left as IMPDEF.
While I agree implementations must be free to choose what suits them
best, I think it'd be good if the document provided a robust default
for the binder construction that collections can reuse if they don't
have any special requirements.

cheers,

> From: RATS <rats-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Carl Wallace
> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2022 1:13 PM
> To: Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing) <ncamwing=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>; rats@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Rats] Request for review and interest
>
> I have reviewed this draft and provided feedback and would do so again as it progresses.
>
> From: RATS <mailto:rats-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of "Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)" <mailto:ncamwing=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> Date: Tuesday, August 2, 2022 at 7:11 PM
> To: "mailto:rats@ietf.org" <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
> Subject: [Rats] Request for review and interest
>
> Hello RATs participants,
>
> There was discussion at the IETF 114 RATs session on EAT media types and more specifically document:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-frost-rats-eat-collection/
>
> This is a call for review and interest to gauge if the working group is interested in working, adopting
> And implementing media types.  Further, if the draft is ready for adoption.
>
> Can we have at least 3 volunteers to review the draft and provide feedback?
>
> Thanks,
> Nancy
> (on behalf of the RATs chairs)
> _______________________________________________ RATS mailing list mailto:RATS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
> _______________________________________________
> RATS mailing list
> RATS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats

-- 
Thomas