[Rats] Re: Adoption call for draft-richardson-rats-geographic-results

[Dhanush S <[e-mail]>]

I support adoption of draft-lkspa-rats-verifiable-geo-fence, as a
contributor to this work.

Regards,
Dhanush S


On Thu, 3 Sept 2026, 9:52 pm Michael Richardson, <[e-mail]>
wrote:

>
> Mark Novak <[e-mail]> wrote:
>     > Second, and more technical: the draft takes pains to explain why
>     > precise GPS coordinates are left out of scope however in the real
> world
>     > there are scenarios where precise coordinates are in fact useful:
>     > e.g. consider a weather sensor deployed in multiple locations to help
>     > adjudicate insurance claims. You want to ascertain that the location
> is
>     > attested fairly precisely in that case. This can definitely be
> handled
>     > post-adoption.
>
> Some of the laptop/desktop text was around this question :-)
> So maybe -03 is better for you.
>
> I have nothing against GNSS, and I understand that signals will be improved
> with authentication.    What I want to avoid is people reading this,
> assuming
> that GNSS is the *ONLY* way, and then dismissing it as inheritely insecure.
>
> Spell-checking.  Let's see how many TLAs get "fixed"
> (oops. It's Briish spellings now. Tough)
>
> --
> Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
>            Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
>
> **       My working hours and your working hours may be different.
>  **
> ** Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours
> **
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RATS mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>