[Rats] what to do with use case document?

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 04 September 2020 20:25 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF0743A0FB7 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 13:25:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IXpQdhbUZJvI for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 13:25:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58CD03A0FB1 for <rats@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 13:25:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82A7F389AF for <rats@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 16:04:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 8Ug9Ksuz0niA for <rats@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 16:04:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3AC5389AD for <rats@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 16:04:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1092BFB for <rats@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 16:25:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: rats@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <159877084697.31165.9701772218171154282@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <159877084697.31165.9701772218171154282@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2020 16:25:47 -0400
Message-ID: <31913.1599251147@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/8tPudaJJTFod-MnAcE4NKsyjZr4>
Subject: [Rats] what to do with use case document?
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote ATtestation procedureS <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2020 20:25:51 -0000

We started this document with idea that the document would never be
published, but would serve as a guide for the other documents.

The architecture is pretty much done: it includes some of the use cases, but
not all.   I am not certain if there is a need to keep the document alive.

If there is, then I can repost it at that time.


IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org> wrote:
    > The following draft will expire soon:

    > Name:     draft-richardson-rats-usecases
    > Title:    Use cases for Remote Attestation common encodings
    > State:    I-D Exists
    > Expires:  2020-09-10 (in 1 week, 3 days)




--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide