[Rats] Re: Review of draft-ietf-rats-pkix-key-attestation-07

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sun, 16 August 2026 21:35 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: rats@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: rats@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B9012AAEAA3 for <rats@mail2.ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:35:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1786916121; bh=3NMdoO9omuR47pBn8/qjEC9242kjzaIZcs2YhySX7Wo=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=BKPJQzHm7MdNpI+d7/ByaMrqY5zbsQ5CndWQwP6ORacmrZ489wg2zYsTJ+PE+vWx9 z4BU57gNpWlfWrahCWdTOAZZZjnMnlqvAXjWVBWZpMoWmDPFuIiscNb136zu6VJXSO aog6oEpVMNIxNUmDkFeJ4u4KsyonXI/3Yuf5ccZE=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ff6u_xGkd6LD for <rats@mail2.ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:35:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 264B812AAEA9B for <rats@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:35:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA52D18010; Sun, 16 Aug 2026 17:35:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with LMTP id mVlBV6b13Sfm; Sun, 16 Aug 2026 17:35:18 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1786916118; bh=fyXqdj701JdqTCnYrnpgQD1KJdvkzyUaAxF3foQ1qxs=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=VgGDQCaIqjezHlTO+EsnAyLoMnj1aC1T6dk51QibX5BtDcfTMO5xVi8S8S4RJKYab quwTNK57amYiyCSfcRhmvOQsO7reqzIM3fBijqgGVdHTc7JBYEWtw0LSOCfxJAKIff gpxwtwbMsHUUQoyHCCEQQA9kNqxYGWS97LOdoI4XgezhwHpb8v1eAxtvVpz4I2TwLb IhExQTHo2fikWppfys9TQyS22DZ2hm8WoY4FU1TpRJNGnf8HKU2jEEEup6gPYLWY62 gun+wuk/Q8Cxc+NWVmlMNd56t5je7sGWtvjd8X6vfCagwCO3I5qBISMEd7Pna1mkj7 +0IJ5UORx9lBw==
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB0B41800C; Sun, 16 Aug 2026 17:35:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7A04182; Sun, 16 Aug 2026 17:35:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Carl Wallace <carl@redhoundsoftware.com>, rats <rats@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <2E969F04-C56B-44FD-9F19-2D0DB0171792@redhoundsoftware.com>
References: <2E969F04-C56B-44FD-9F19-2D0DB0171792@redhoundsoftware.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.8+dev; Emacs 30.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0;<'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2026 17:35:18 -0400
Message-ID: <30772.1786916118@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Message-ID-Hash: GE6L66L7X5RTOBOCRBY6GTZ5DXTVBLHH
X-Message-ID-Hash: GE6L66L7X5RTOBOCRBY6GTZ5DXTVBLHH
X-MailFrom: mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-rats.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Rats] Re: Review of draft-ietf-rats-pkix-key-attestation-07
List-Id: Remote ATtestation procedureS <rats.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/AxyfOfQV2tPtcwvuKApO5oBM290>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:rats-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:rats-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:rats-leave@ietf.org>

Carl Wallace <carl@redhoundsoftware.com> wrote:
    > Previously I sent a note questioning the draft's defining its own
    > signature envelope, instead of reusing SignedData from CMS. This note
    > provides a more detailed review. These items are not in any particular
    > order.

I think that the authors heard: "please use all of CMS"


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

**       My working hours and your working hours may be different.         **
** Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours **