IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rats] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rats-architecture-20.txt

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 28 July 2022 22:10 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3BE2C136306 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 15:10:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rg-Bl-izm5I8 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 15:10:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00:e000:2bb::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6E87C15C531 for <rats@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 15:10:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (dhcp-808f.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.128.143]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2D941F448 for <rats@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 22:10:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id C3D1E1A05CE; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 18:10:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: rats@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <165904592386.20703.3410282768783305423@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <165904592386.20703.3410282768783305423@ietfa.amsl.com>
Comments: In-reply-to internet-drafts@ietf.org message dated "Thu, 28 Jul 2022 15:05:23 -0700."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 18:10:04 -0400
Message-ID: <484938.1659046204@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/PLSKQmtC2wQVOvi1OFskRZrsuyQ>
Subject: Re: [Rats] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rats-architecture-20.txt
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote ATtestation procedureS <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 22:10:08 -0000

internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
    > A diff from the previous version is available at:
    > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rats-architecture-20

I got verbal confirmation from Dave, and a review from Thomas, so I merged
and I've posted this change.

Compared to the text that I posted a few hours ago, we have moved the text
into section 1 rather than section 2.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email