IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Rats] Re: Clarifications in draft-ietf-rats-eat

Muhammad Usama Sardar <muhammad_usama.sardar@tu-dresden.de> Fri, 11 April 2025 19:22 UTC

Return-Path: <muhammad_usama.sardar@tu-dresden.de>
X-Original-To: rats@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: rats@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DADEA1AE07B8 for <rats@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Apr 2025 12:22:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.397
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.397 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tu-dresden.de
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q2xQlFVuppbj for <rats@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Apr 2025 12:22:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout4.zih.tu-dresden.de (mailout4.zih.tu-dresden.de [141.30.67.75]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 054681AE07A8 for <rats@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Apr 2025 12:22:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tu-dresden.de; s=dkim2022; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:CC:To :Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=qXykq9TY2BurnXVWZbylYpYghLr2SrBsJYcRggSbtBI=; b=d70gb8rxIMKXMX+MXJDRMSlXFN mqAbZBcyVqTd0JOmzqWR4jD8cRB7EcTTDMJVWdl7GVarm4CRA2oRAUQl0asOnUuPAOzBFpRY+DSIh LZ2wPFtSKAYwxYVdV+pr5L6FqKp300X0f4s7Uoum99xMLQya1A8g9aJ+gUPcavJmAI/kGFeBbigPV exw/vr8rmzcN4/D4y+mI+c1790EkGl1mnEznaMsTWcvMpV74vO/z9KkNDXeu2WQYiP+d8uiCP+zrC fpkdPvollLFS9yUTghXRiGeqxfVgLoIPO2AcWc6GUgwxfMv1vNpLEEnMLmsqGY4cISH57dhF3us2z YTGPUJdg==;
Received: from [172.26.35.139] (helo=msx.tu-dresden.de) by mailout4.zih.tu-dresden.de with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <muhammad_usama.sardar@tu-dresden.de>) id 1u3Jwx-00DDmM-F7; Fri, 11 Apr 2025 21:22:03 +0200
Received: from [10.12.5.228] (81.201.156.93) by msx-t422.msx.ad.zih.tu-dresden.de (172.26.35.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1748.10; Fri, 11 Apr 2025 21:22:00 +0200
Message-ID: <6c512999-4cb2-4104-bf68-462614492866@tu-dresden.de>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 21:21:58 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, Jeremy O'Donoghue <jodonogh@qti.qualcomm.com>, Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com>
References: <4abff904-74ef-473f-8b80-6ba563018744@tu-dresden.de> <D6C150AF-DB13-439C-862E-93CEBF573F34@island-resort.com> <LV8PR02MB100170F5C089781552960B6D0F2B62@LV8PR02MB10017.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <bd70a904-8675-43d6-8113-13ef9107450d@tu-dresden.de> <BN2P110MB11079B13F236A1EC6D6087BEDCB6A@BN2P110MB1107.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Muhammad Usama Sardar <muhammad_usama.sardar@tu-dresden.de>
In-Reply-To: <BN2P110MB11079B13F236A1EC6D6087BEDCB6A@BN2P110MB1107.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-512"; boundary="------------ms060108090605050802050306"
X-ClientProxiedBy: MSX-L415.msx.ad.zih.tu-dresden.de (172.26.34.135) To msx-t422.msx.ad.zih.tu-dresden.de (172.26.35.139)
X-TUD-Virus-Scanned: mailout4.zih.tu-dresden.de
Message-ID-Hash: 7MFQKWIXLWXPF3FEXTJZTFV53M4IQKD7
X-Message-ID-Hash: 7MFQKWIXLWXPF3FEXTJZTFV53M4IQKD7
X-MailFrom: muhammad_usama.sardar@tu-dresden.de
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-rats.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "rats@ietf.org" <rats@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Rats] Re: Clarifications in draft-ietf-rats-eat
List-Id: Remote ATtestation procedureS <rats.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/RcapHvUFkAo60GOCKvhw0x3YWlU>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:rats-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:rats-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:rats-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Roman,

On 11.04.25 20:52, Roman Danyliw wrote:
> The reason for some of this pushback is that the time for changing 
> this document barring errors or RFC Editor recommendations has concluded.

Fair point. I am not insisting on a change in RFC.

However, I would like to seek clarifications on editor's/WG's 
perspective. Jeremy pointed debate in "considerable detail". I couldn't 
find much related to second paragraph of introduction on the list. Did I 
miss something?

Can the editors please provide me an authentic reference of where the 
text in the second paragraph is coming from?

Usama

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status