Re: [Rats] Initiating WGLC for draft-ietf-rats-msg-wrap-03

Hi, all,

We think we have addressed all the comments we have received during WGLC [1].

Thanks for the great feedback, which resulted in some major
improvements both editorial and content-wise.

If you look at the diff [2], there are a few notable changes, mostly
related to Dionna's and Carl's comments about unifying CMW and CMW
collections and the ability to deal with mixed encodings in a
collection:

1. A "tunnelling" construct now exists to move CMWs of one type into
collections of another type
2. CMW collections have been added to the top-level CMW production

The latter has a couple of interesting repercussions:
1. The PKIX extension now applies to both type&value CMWs and collections
2. An optional  "__cmcw_t" label was added to type a collection with a
unique identifier

Also, some editorial changes:
1. CDDL refactoring to improve readability
2. s/array/record/g
3. more examples

Thank you!

[1] https://github.com/ietf-rats-wg/draft-ietf-rats-msg-wrap/issues?q=is%3Aissue+label%3AWGLC+
[2] https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-rats-msg-wrap-04

On Sat, 3 Feb 2024 at 16:50, Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)
<ncamwing=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
> Hello RATS participants,
>
>
>
> There have been a few comments and several updates to draft-ietf-rats-msg-wrap-03.
>
> We are going to initiate a first WGLC to assess its maturity for publication and get more feedback.
>
>
>
> Thanks to Carl Wallace and Tom Jones for their prior feedback, can you please let us know if your
>
> Comments are address in this latest draft and believe it is ready for publication?
>
>
>
> We also need a few others to comment on the draft especially on maturity and readiness for
>
> Publication.  The end of this WGLC is Feb. 23, 2024.
>
>
>
> Best, Nancy
>
> _______________________________________________
> RATS mailing list
> RATS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats