[Rats] Last Call: <draft-ietf-rats-endorsements-09.txt> (RATS Endorsements) to Informational RFC

The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Mon, 24 August 2026 15:53 UTC

Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: rats@ietf.org
Delivered-To: rats@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from [10.244.9.123] (gaia.k8s.ietf.org [4.156.85.76]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A55612E71113; Mon, 24 Aug 2026 08:53:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1787586821; bh=okenT7B0gL/RKcYzPyE0W6wSzv3An4VxZ+K4SeJEwHU=; h=From:To:Subject:CC:Reply-To:Date; b=TBVOmY1PfSHFXE27Pg3pJHdGJUhAUOngIcCONXL4xyV3GiqaoCbNGmmpSm23yI8nC y61K938c/iimjpVXHYcV9bJV8gdbEDyrx5VdJc/JwKK5/65cy5KmgspoOrCJdGI3cy 919maYNTupkgTfWh08/aGO8TinwuRZEFnYYChRZg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.72.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Sender: iesg-secretary@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <178758682098.439112.9535702277392373903@dt-datatracker-786f84c586-vck88>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 08:53:40 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: FRNZVGINQXLGCV5HXYOSOOR5VBL4RAWY
X-Message-ID-Hash: FRNZVGINQXLGCV5HXYOSOOR5VBL4RAWY
X-MailFrom: iesg-secretary@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-rats.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-ietf-rats-endorsements@ietf.org, rats-chairs@ietf.org, rats@ietf.org, stndrds-inacio@andrew.cmu.edu, yogesh.deshpande@arm.com
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Reply-To: last-call@ietf.org
Subject: [Rats] Last Call: <draft-ietf-rats-endorsements-09.txt> (RATS Endorsements) to Informational RFC
List-Id: Remote ATtestation procedureS <rats.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/Yb76ir20k3GrvfAvSkZIi4iowMU>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:rats-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:rats-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:rats-leave@ietf.org>

The IESG has received a request from the Remote ATtestation ProcedureS WG
(rats) to consider the following document: - 'RATS Endorsements'
  <draft-ietf-rats-endorsements-09.txt> as Informational RFC

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
last-call@ietf.org mailing lists by 2026-09-07. Exceptionally, comments may
be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning
of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract


   In the IETF Remote Attestation Procedures (RATS) architecture, a
   Verifier accepts Evidence and uses Appraisal Policy for Evidence,
   typically with additional input from Endorsements and Reference
   Values, to generate Attestation Results in formats that are useful
   for Relying Parties.  This document illustrates the purpose and role
   of Endorsements and discusses some considerations in the choice of
   message format for Endorsements in the scope of the RATS
   architecture.

   This document does not aim to define a conceptual message format for
   Endorsements and Reference Values.  Instead, it extends RFC9334 to
   provide further details on Reference Values and Endorsements, as
   these topics were outside the scope of the RATS charter when RFC9334
   was developed.




The file can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rats-endorsements/



No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.