Re: [Rats] Attestation Results for Connectivity

[Dave Thaler <[e-mail]>]

Hi Eric, et al.   I have read the document and added my comments in a marked up copy at
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/uploads/prod/2021/04/draft-voit-rats-attestation-results-00-DTreview.pdf

BTW, the CCC SIG is indeed called the "CCC Attestation SIG" and not the "CCC AAA SIG" 😊

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: RATS <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Eric Voit (evoit)
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 12:01 PM
To: Thomas Fossati <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
Cc: Scarlata, Vincent R <[e-mail]>; Thomas Hardjono <[e-mail]>; Henk Birkholz <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [Rats] Attestation Results for Connectivity

I meant to the CCC  AAA SIG   :-)         But this will get the word out for sure.

Eric

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Fossati <[e-mail]>
> Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 2:49 PM
> To: [e-mail]
> Cc: Henk Birkholz <[e-mail]>; Thomas Hardjono 
> <[e-mail]>; Scarlata, Vincent R 
> <[e-mail]>; Thomas Fossati 
> <[e-mail]>; Eric Voit (evoit) <[e-mail]>
> Subject: Re: Attestation Results for Connectivity
> 
> <shameless_plug>
> 
> Tomorrow, we are discussing this topic at the CCC Attestation SIG meeting.
> Needless to say, everyone is more than welcome to join the call.
> 
> For the details regarding agenda & zoom link, see:
> 
> https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs
> .google.com%2Fdocument%2Fd%2F1NkiS78knPhDO0vA9ElS-&amp;data=04%7C01%7C
> dthaler%40microsoft.com%7C7058c2c5167b495c547a08d908e5d7da%7C72f988bf8
> 6f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637550605542933134%7CUnknown%7CTWFpb
> GZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0
> %3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=BNx%2FHfu7ptDXErqqe0vgNuVWr1kBb00GnHbbFH7m2OU%3D&
> amp;reserved=0 bQOHNu783gGPdmTEbbOoOOU/edit?usp=sharing
> 
> cheers!
> 
> </shameless_plug>
> 
> On 26/04/2021, 18:12, "Eric Voit (evoit)" <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >
> > We have just submitted a new draft:   Attestation Results for
> > Connectivity
> > https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fda
> > tatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-voit-rats-attestation-results%2F&am
> > p;data=04%7C01%7Cdthaler%40microsoft.com%7C7058c2c5167b495c547a08d90
> > 8e5d7da%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637550605542933
> > 134%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJB
> > TiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=3LaG5MGjcx3q1izo6sKzhcuK
> > 7fTXT2BwZBw93AOb6jA%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >
> > This draft defines reusable Attestation Result information elements.
> > When these elements are offered to Relying Parties as Evidence, 
> > different aspects of Attester trustworthiness can be evaluated.
> > Additionally, where the Relying Party is interfacing with a 
> > heterogenous mix of Attesting Environment and Verifier types, 
> > consistent policies can be applied to subsequent information 
> > exchange between each Attester and the Relying Party.
> >
> > We would be very interested in your thoughts and input!
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >    Eric Voit – [e-mail]
> >    Henk Birkholz – [e-mail]
> >    Thomas Hardjono – [e-mail]
> >    Thomas Fossati – [e-mail]
> >    Vincent Scarlata – [e-mail]
> 
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are 
> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended 
> recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose 
> the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or 
> copy the information in any medium. Thank you.