IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rats] POLL: RATS rechartering

Meiling Chen <chenmeiling@chinamobile.com> Wed, 30 March 2022 03:33 UTC

Return-Path: <chenmeiling@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C24B3A0908 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 20:33:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL=1.31, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rVP1eINBpc-h for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 20:33:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta3.chinamobile.com (cmccmta3.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D2163A08D0 for <rats@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 20:33:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.1]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app12-12012 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2eec6243cf6b93a-b8326; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 11:33:00 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2eec6243cf6b93a-b8326
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from cmcc-PC (unknown[10.2.51.26]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr01-12001 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee16243cf6a462-8a6cb; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 11:32:59 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee16243cf6a462-8a6cb
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 11:33:03 +0800
From: Meiling Chen <chenmeiling@chinamobile.com>
To: "ned.smith" <ned.smith@intel.com>, "rats@ietf.org" <rats@ietf.org>
References: <3247B82A-634B-433E-80A3-4500EA41D205@intel.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.9.115[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <202203301133034001465@chinamobile.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart858531627352_=----"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/lmESfMPq4mPwOqMgNl_K1cQZpis>
Subject: Re: [Rats] POLL: RATS rechartering
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote ATtestation procedureS <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 03:33:07 -0000

Hi,
YES to the recharter.
 
From: Smith, Ned
Date: 2022-03-29 00:27
To: rats@ietf.org
Subject: [Rats] POLL: RATS rechartering
During IETF 113 RATS rechartering discussion the Program of Work section, item 5 was modified. 
Old text:
Standardize interoperable protocols to securely convey evidence and attestation results.
 
New text:
Standardize interoperable protocols to securely convey evidence and attestation results with a strong preference to use existing protocols.
 
The proposed new charter is found here: charter/ietf-rats-charter.md at 2nd-RC4 ยท ietf-rats/charter (github.com)
 
Prior to 113, there were approximately 8 votes in favor of adopting the new charter. There were approximately 32 attendees who participated in the straw poll during the RATS session who had not read the new charter. 
 
Please vote yes/no/abstain
 
Voting:
Does the RATS working group approve the charter as defined in the proposed new charter (see above link)?
 
Thank You,
WG chairs

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email