Re: [Rats] Request for review and interest [draft-frost-rats-eat-collection-02]

Carl Wallace <> Wed, 21 December 2022 12:24 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B26C0C14CE5D for <>; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 04:24:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.094
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LyWtitWJdJxG for <>; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 04:24:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F13FC14CE57 for <>; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 04:24:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id z12so13460587qtv.5 for <>; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 04:24:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:thread-topic:message-id:to:from :subject:date:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Y3/4/9q3/UnXj7/OtjMkVISPzPHnqE0JtT1BULwi5y8=; b=Cbs8qGFTDWqU4JW5/zuoGJtQDna9RewyWzHJhcXnd8RDlrEK7BhsSxXDXDqLb9y2hZ JlDyx8GtdMNFCfl9rm86kCTGyQ6ZWGPrHVsoyLF9fbM1an7S4bzPInfbdR3mYJpAUQ/z pgCfQmgfwtq9IzNXx+R9dNX4USD6dQYIKQaeA=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20210112; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:thread-topic:message-id:to:from :subject:date:user-agent:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Y3/4/9q3/UnXj7/OtjMkVISPzPHnqE0JtT1BULwi5y8=; b=sAAPgNfmGXcAUBThSXkjAZUVwKIip661xEcKvNolpNXZ6zurLunOSfJsBg8EFYGd5v 1xC/rsOvWDBGZ41CrCUxbdKXzE46xZDzgsFCJetEud0RA9lPEVS60HQUM0zM6pjhMDnZ muXkiXSpaox7ggPCuUTo2onGUgNHfIYpjxdrPt/spvQYV/dpIbyvnIbuqfC//wrKnJ4r LOfKwJ0qYFxqXzySozGaqFppKkP5FcOkyyC8eCgsewnEM+NzYJlGWNvJ9xlQHoh9haq5 QKWX0SNuOre+hcojfqzLnxsgfeeDstUvqLvodTYW+v/A8EiV/dPuNmISgfLb57ipoy53 WCnQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kofGHDo7Wwo7PltFLpRxqWvN5XTKqwHAqOYi84T8tGYu0N66MrP BiM4J3IpJKYKU91kQZMy92kQCw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXtlGkxLj+/ZuIEJk1DSZtwF7OclVS/6Acs9/4EGyNjL8V4VLhWLcpDL7ggq/p7SuMnNqNVEXg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:5810:b0:3a8:15d2:6e8b with SMTP id fg16-20020a05622a581000b003a815d26e8bmr1486890qtb.33.1671625442866; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 04:24:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [] ( []) by with ESMTPSA id r21-20020ae9d615000000b006fa84082b6dsm10731260qkk.128.2022. (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Dec 2022 04:24:02 -0800 (PST)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.68.22121100
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 07:24:01 -0500
From: Carl Wallace <>
To: Simon Frost <>, "Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)" <>, "" <>
Message-ID: <>
Thread-Topic: [Rats] Request for review and interest [draft-frost-rats-eat-collection-02]
References: <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3754452242_354118169"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Rats] Request for review and interest [draft-frost-rats-eat-collection-02]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote ATtestation procedureS <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 12:24:08 -0000

I reviewed the changes and the new binder definition seems like a good addition, but I think the CDDL in figure 1 ought include the definition of the claim that will receive the binder value (or the prose should include some language re: how the binder value is located in the destination claim).


From: RATS <> on behalf of Simon Frost <>
Date: Tuesday, December 13, 2022 at 12:01 PM
To: "Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)" <>, "" <>
Subject: Re: [Rats] Request for review and interest [draft-frost-rats-eat-collection-02]


Further to previous discussion on the Collections EAT extension, please note that a new draft (-02) is available:


Changes reflect response to reviews & a proposal for a ‘binder’ claim that describes the contract between entries. Thanks to Thomas Fossati for his contributions with respect to this claim.





From: Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing) <> 
Sent: 03 August 2022 21:57
Subject: Re: [Rats] Request for review and interest


Apologies for the cut-n-paste faux pas.  To clarify, this is a call for interest on 



It is not a media type but rather a top-level extension to EAT (Thomas raised

that a new media type may be needed, my bad).  Nonetheless, we need more

review feedback (thanks to Laurence for early comments) on this new EAT

extension but we need a few more to provide feedback.


Thanks, Nancy


From: Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing) <>
Date: Tuesday, August 2, 2022 at 4:11 PM
To: <>
Subject: Request for review and interest

Hello RATs participants,


There was discussion at the IETF 114 RATs session on EAT media types and more specifically document:


This is a call for review and interest to gauge if the working group is interested in working, adopting

And implementing media types.  Further, if the draft is ready for adoption.


Can we have at least 3 volunteers to review the draft and provide feedback?




(on behalf of the RATs chairs)

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. 

_______________________________________________ RATS mailing list