[Raw] repeating comment from yesterday's bof
Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Thu, 21 November 2019 04:33 UTC
Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: raw@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: raw@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 474D8120963 for <raw@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 20:33:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d-973DfPeCop for <raw@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 20:33:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gproxy9-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy9-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.20.122]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9490012095D for <raw@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 20:33:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cmgw12.unifiedlayer.com (unknown [10.9.0.12]) by gproxy9.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 267861E07D0 for <raw@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 21:33:33 -0700 (MST)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id Xe9siWurj94wVXe9sikVtf; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 21:33:33 -0700
X-Authority-Reason: nr=8
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=P58UeBIu c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=dLZJa+xiwSxG16/P+YVxDGlgEgI=:19 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10:nop_ipv6 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10:nop_charset_1 a=MeAgGD-zjQ4A:10:nop_rcvd_month_year a=Vy_oeq2dmq0A:10:endurance_base64_authed_username_1 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=JD7AkbQt6ezV0HSS1w8A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10:nop_charset_2 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22 a=pHzHmUro8NiASowvMSCR:22 a=nt3jZW36AmriUCFCBwmW:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=MLIJzHZ6bzrKO0NxZuDOiLBXo0pSBxeVyYpMrP7HWMM=; b=Rl2rv5kU7ivYToWU6vqbFiXQGF zD9LwG+QkqpJf09/MFzyRZjmA8ZmIcf96WCz6BhY+jbnLzrs9GzpncLCKQDeG4DDCAxjujqhuPr7z mJmzT2o4ha1QcqnlFkB/F9A5X;
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (port=21203 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1iXe9s-002KAk-H8 for raw@ietf.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 21:33:32 -0700
To: "raw@ietf.org" <raw@ietf.org>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <a388d21b-dab8-4091-5fd5-03da7ac6f734@labn.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 12:33:30 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-Source-L: Yes
X-Exim-ID: 1iXe9s-002KAk-H8
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: ([IPv6:::1]) [127.0.0.1]:21203
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 1
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/raw/EhagCJBqfRvI_cXyOpAUhDaeHN4>
Subject: [Raw] repeating comment from yesterday's bof
X-BeenThere: raw@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: reliable and available wireless <raw.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/raw>, <mailto:raw-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/raw/>
List-Post: <mailto:raw@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:raw-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/raw>, <mailto:raw-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 04:33:43 -0000
Hi, I just wanted to repeat a comment I made at the mic yesterday. Independent of a RAW WG being formed or not, the DetNet Working Group is available to discuss and welcomes any proposals/drafts related to (a) service protection -- e.g., PREOF today, PAREO tomorrow -- or (b) mapping DetNt to different subnetwork technologies -- e.g., TSN today, wireless tomorrow DetNet meets today during afternoon sessions II and III, for more info see https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/106/materials/agenda-106-detnet-06 Cheers, Lou DetNet co-chair
- [Raw] repeating comment from yesterday's bof Lou Berger