[Raw] Mirja Kühlewind's Abstain on charter-ietf-raw-00-00: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 21 January 2020 10:07 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: raw@ietf.org
Delivered-To: raw@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48F2F1200E6; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 02:07:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind_via_Datatracker?= <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: raw-chairs@ietf.org, raw@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.116.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind?= <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Message-ID: <157960127225.28909.11468675451961273225.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 02:07:52 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/raw/lXog1Mz8ErVkmsdaDqB0nX6ejrI>
Subject: [Raw] =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind=27s_Abstain_on_charter-ietf?= =?utf-8?q?-raw-00-00=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: raw@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: reliable and available wireless <raw.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/raw>, <mailto:raw-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/raw/>
List-Post: <mailto:raw@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:raw-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/raw>, <mailto:raw-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 10:07:52 -0000

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-raw-00-00: Abstain

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


I'm uncertain what to ballot here, so I'll abstain.

It's unclear to me which if any documents the working group will produce. I
agree with Alvaro that is would be good to be more explicit about this to
support the chairs and future ADs.

I also still don't quite understand why this is not part of the DetNet group.
It seems that the DetNet people have to go to this group anyway. So why not
adding it the DetNet charter and the chairs could just e.g. request two
sessions at the meeting and use this to split the discussion. Such an approach
would enable a much smoother and hopefully faster convergence to solution work
if any is needed.