IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Raw] Yaakov’s new draft on segment routing approach to TSN

wangyali <wangyali11@huawei.com> Thu, 04 March 2021 06:17 UTC

Return-Path: <wangyali11@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: raw@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: raw@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68ACF3A136C; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 22:17:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ftBue-Cy4LC1; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 22:17:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90A8B3A136D; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 22:17:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fraeml702-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.207]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4DrgVK105pz67vDK; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 14:11:21 +0800 (CST)
Received: from fraeml702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.51) by fraeml702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.51) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2106.2; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 07:17:05 +0100
Received: from DGGEML424-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.41) by fraeml702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.51) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA_P256) id 15.1.2106.2 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 07:17:04 +0100
Received: from DGGEML504-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.11.115]) by dggeml424-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.1.199.41]) with mapi id 14.03.0513.000; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 14:17:00 +0800
From: wangyali <wangyali11@huawei.com>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "raw-chairs@ietf.org" <raw-chairs@ietf.org>
CC: "raw@ietf.org" <raw@ietf.org>, Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@rad.com>
Thread-Topic: Yaakov’s new draft on segment routing approach to TSN
Thread-Index: AQHXEFbg4Sk+ko9CvkG7tB1y7qjs7qpzWDbA
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 06:16:59 +0000
Message-ID: <1520992FC97B944A9979C2FC1D7DB0F40525DB02@DGGEML504-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <CD30C26E-E0C8-42B1-B862-04BECE9461F5@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CD30C26E-E0C8-42B1-B862-04BECE9461F5@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.108.243.136]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_1520992FC97B944A9979C2FC1D7DB0F40525DB02DGGEML504MBSchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/raw/ooD2jK22FPuWXY8JD9B_lHf3lkc>
Subject: Re: [Raw] Yaakov’s new draft on segment routing approach to TSN
X-BeenThere: raw@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: reliable and available wireless <raw.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/raw>, <mailto:raw-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/raw/>
List-Post: <mailto:raw@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:raw-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/raw>, <mailto:raw-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 06:17:13 -0000

Hi Pascal,

Many thanks for your sharing. I support and am interested in this topic.

I’ve read the draft about RAW Architecture, which also points out the encapsulation IP-in-IP to signal the Track or the subTrack.

Best,
Yali

From: RAW [mailto:raw-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
Sent: Thursday, March 4, 2021 1:59 AM
To: raw-chairs@ietf.org
Cc: raw@ietf.org; Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@rad.com>
Subject: [Raw] Yaakov’s new draft on segment routing approach to TSN

Dear chairs

I’ve read Yaakov ‘s draft https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-stein-srtsn/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-stein-srtsn/> with great interest, and suggest that people interested in RAW follow suit if you can.

This draft could evolve in several places but being related to bounded latency I believe it is important for us to be very aware of it.

 I know it was not discussed on this list, but it probably could/ should have; the draft discusses capabilities that match our PSE model and the idea to signal the per-hop behavior in an SRH which echoes our architecture. It also introduces a clear separation of the where and the when the packet is forwarded, a topic that we could also discuss in the architecture.

All and all it would be great to get Yaakov to talk to us at the virtual IETF meeting, what do you think?
Keep safe,

Pascal

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email