Re: [rddp] MPA has been approved

My congratulations to the RDDP WG as well! Start planning your  
victory party for San Diego.

We'll leave the WG in formal existence until the RFCs are appearing,  
in case any late changes require WG discussion (I don't expect it in  
this case). With the current level of RFC Editor activity, I expect  
publication to happen well before the Spring IETF.

Lars

On Oct 27, 2006, at 0:53, Black_David@emc.com wrote:
> This completes the planned work of the RDDP Working Group - all
> of our drafts are now approved and are (or shortly will be) in
> the RFC Editor's Queue.  I want to thank all the authors, and
> in particular recognize Paul Culley for his work on MPA - major
> structural changes to the MPA draft were unexpectedly needed
> after it left the WG, and Paul was diligent in getting them
> done.
>
> Authors should not tune out of RDDP entirely - authors will be
> hearing from the RFC Editor and yours truly when the editing
> is done, as approval by every author is required before an
> RFC is published.  This may be a while in the future, as we have
> a couple of normative references to drafts from other WGs that
> will probably determine when the entire set of RFCs can be
> published:
> - The RDDP SCTP draft references draft-ietf-tsvwg-addip-sctp
> - The RDDP RDMAP draft references draft-ietf-ips-iser

-- 
Lars Eggert                                     NEC Network Laboratories

Re: [rddp] MPA has been approved

Attachment: smime.p7s