RE: [rddp] WG Last Call: Applicability, SCTP Adaptation, MPA

[[e-mail]]

Hemal,

It won't be a problem, but thanks for noticing.  I'll go send a
note to the secretariat to the effect that these drafts are *not*
to be expired because they are in WG Last Call.

Thanks,
--David
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Senior Technologist
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
[phone]             FAX: [phone]
[e-mail]        Mobile: [phone]
----------------------------------------------------

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shah, Hemal [mailto:[e-mail]] 
> Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 12:15 AM
> To: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: RE: [rddp] WG Last Call: Applicability, SCTP Adaptation, MPA
> 
> David,
> 
> The applicability and SCTP adaptation drafts are expiring on 3/11/2005
> and 3/28/2005 respectively. Is that going to be a concern for the last
> call which ends on 4/4/2005?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Hemal
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On 
> Behalf Of
> [e-mail]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 5:28 PM
> To: [e-mail]
> Subject: [rddp] WG Last Call: Applicability, SCTP Adaptation, MPA
> Importance: High
> 
> The previous WG Last Call went so well that it's time
> to do it again ... so, I hereby announce the RDDP Working
> Group Last Call on the following three drafts:
> 
> Applicability of Remote Direct Memory Access Protocol
>    (RDMA) and Direct Data Placement (DDP)
> 	(draft-ietf-rddp-applicability-02.txt)
> Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Remote Direct
>    Memory Access (RDMA) Direct Data Placement (DDP)
>    Adaptation
> 	(draft-ietf-rddp-sctp-01.txt)
> Marker PDU Aligned Framing for TCP Specification 
> 	(draft-ietf-rddp-mpa-02.txt)
> 
> This WG Last Call will run until 11:59pm Eastern Time (US)
> on Monday, April 4th (I was thinking about having it end
> on April 1st [April Fools Day] and decided to pass on that
> opportunity).  The SCTP Adaptation draft is intended to
> become a standards track RFC, the Applicability draft is
> intended to become an informational RFC, and whether the
> MPA draft is to become standards track vs. informational
> will be determined after the conclusion of this WG Last Call.
> 
> Technical comments need to be posted to this mailing list.
> Editorial comments may be sent directly to the primary
> draft authors:
> 
> - Applicability: Caitlin Bestler <cait -at- asomi.com>
> - SCTP Adaptation: Randall R. Stewart <rrs -at- cisco.com> AND
> 		Caitlin Bestler <cait -at- asomi.com>
> - RDMAP: Paul R. Culley <paul.culley -at- hp.com>
> 
> Please copy me (as WG chair - David Black <black_david -at-
> emc.com>) on any editorial comments, just in case something
> initially thought to be editorial turns out to have technical
> content.  The intent is to resolve WG Last Call issues on
> the mailing list, but an RDDP WG meeting in Paris is a
> possibility if it is needed to resolve issues.
> 
> There are other drafts linked to the WG's web page:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/rddp-charter.html
> 
> that may be of interest or relevance in reviewing the three
> drafts for this WG Last Call.
> 
> Many thanks to all whose hard work has gotten us this far,
> --David (RDDP WG chair)
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------
> David L. Black, Senior Technologist
> EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
> [phone]             FAX: [phone]
> [e-mail]        Mobile: [phone]
> ----------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rddp mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp
> 

_______________________________________________
rddp mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp