Re: [re-ECN] "Is a standard required?"
John Leslie <john@jlc.net> Thu, 29 April 2010 14:27 UTC
Return-Path: <john@jlc.net>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448173A68D7 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 07:27:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.376
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.376 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.223, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1VS-bbzODs3v for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 07:27:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.jlc.net (mailhost.jlc.net [199.201.159.9]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97EC13A699E for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 07:21:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mailhost.jlc.net (Postfix, from userid 104) id 613B333C29; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:21:30 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:21:30 -0400
From: John Leslie <john@jlc.net>
To: "Woundy, Richard" <Richard_Woundy@cable.comcast.com>
Message-ID: <20100429142130.GH14169@verdi>
References: <EE00404438E9444D90AEA84210DC4067079B3B@pacdcexcmb05.cable.comcast.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <EE00404438E9444D90AEA84210DC4067079B3B@pacdcexcmb05.cable.comcast.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Cc: re-ecn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] "Is a standard required?"
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:27:06 -0000
Woundy, Richard <Richard_Woundy@cable.comcast.com> wrote: > [John Leslie wrote:] > >> I'd like to point to the ALTO WG, trying to develop a scavenger- >> class service. They want to back off especially quickly if there >> turns out to be congestion. > > Do you mean LEDBAT instead of ALTO? Actually, I was thinking both, but LEDBAT slipped my mind. You are correct that LEDBAT is charged with developing the scavenger-class service. -- John Leslie <john@jlc.net>
- Re: [re-ECN] "Is a standard required?" Woundy, Richard
- Re: [re-ECN] "Is a standard required?" John Leslie
- Re: [re-ECN] "Is a standard required?" Fred Baker