[Recentattendees] Extended Friday afternoon schedule at IETF 118 Prague

IETF Executive Director <exec-director@ietf.org> Fri, 11 August 2023 14:28 UTC

Return-Path: <jay@staff.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: recentattendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: recentattendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F406C14CE52 for <recentattendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 07:28:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ietf-org.20221208.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LOvovjVmhvKQ for <recentattendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 07:28:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52b.google.com (mail-ed1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F5BBC151070 for <recentattendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 07:28:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5234f46c6f9so2695428a12.3 for <recentattendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 07:28:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ietf-org.20221208.gappssmtp.com; s=20221208; t=1691764115; x=1692368915; h=to:cc:message-id:date:subject:mime-version:reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=QTJL+hHKhpvQ1UzV5bpVx+ypLD2T7Nfz3I0auhTrZYY=; b=KplsV/9+4xzJXHnedbX3eSo2yPA/rk227PAPasBknIcJARHtJjBZD2cDjHgWaAt8iF yFAo746EXHUcSkRZkboVkKs/oIZdBqhbwTW5nPAIL8nJ2W7RuuoFmE5qMX7sRpSN6gbF rRfaB6Cp5ZmDvaASNwh1Kx61Hn8yumYujoNqo0EUhAkLPs5OBdC5HQ3lI62irkSJqltR yt5IjKpA5Y5FCwKZlTnCksZV1WCOkdo5dahFZrtGvUfBgMXJa1av3sPmMagPoEi6LHB2 Akb4THLfW7KP6imbGhxeIyrfrRVhf8ncPcJb1pCE6+MWxKgiZkm+Ahrln+aIsAfedX83 3xzg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1691764115; x=1692368915; h=to:cc:message-id:date:subject:mime-version:reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=QTJL+hHKhpvQ1UzV5bpVx+ypLD2T7Nfz3I0auhTrZYY=; b=NKeZtsKmcMfs9LgU4xYMDPr0Os+eopReoBNu+xjlUFRBU0STqriQdr6kx1CzDb9X49 v0Oa1JDSI+JshnRoVi/mJZBLyMO34j1sHF7uL/udmxvPjRXV7t97skMRFkeBb8bfhse+ eDiXI8JNN/QJdikYmGdmboOWyR7JZpdXeU5GvueJ3FnOwqWkr3/liu2iqEtwlYFUpsdp mSPuaf4RPnFGTE189iCx87NJY0aNcW1yg+1eKjUwCTrHEBWdvkDHvPdDoIAovLTgocl+ aEpqYdOcSQtPKIEx/G0DVd70Ja5ZMmzL0Z3qqKhrysiIvffLIKYUfAtyEVKbw50Gmtav nixw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw8DhA6u4CrocJ/cVEklwg88W7OZcmV3fhluUhcMddc38rZDBmj smK0MEjKJizcvYvT513iXDlgNp+OxsWw88PVIlH4hYlq
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFPyqhK7GJluu3wUZV46yHjDUmc9e5G/awzvOmX9X6iS8B+QfWA4YfwwBwg16wVuAaMDbGf5A==
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:cd70:0:b0:523:3ef2:b97f with SMTP id ca16-20020aa7cd70000000b005233ef2b97fmr1920417edb.1.1691764114953; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 07:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([92.27.125.209]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bf20-20020a0564021a5400b0051d9dbf5edfsm2140587edb.55.2023.08.11.07.28.34 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 11 Aug 2023 07:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: IETF Executive Director <exec-director@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Reply-To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.600.7\))
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 15:28:23 +0100
Message-Id: <1EAADD7D-7FA0-4759-9FC3-2EEC439BDF0B@ietf.org>
Cc: recentattendees@ietf.org
To: IETF Announcement List <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.600.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/recentattendees/yK-EiGpMVJuXWRZqN8JOl1oCbTg>
Subject: [Recentattendees] Extended Friday afternoon schedule at IETF 118 Prague
X-BeenThere: recentattendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Recent IETF Attendees <recentattendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/recentattendees>, <mailto:recentattendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/recentattendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:recentattendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:recentattendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/recentattendees>, <mailto:recentattendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 14:28:42 -0000

The demand for Working Group (WG) and Research Group (RG) sessions during IETF meetings continues to grow and now exceeds the available session capacity.  In response the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG) has decided that an additional 2-hour session will be added on the Friday afternoon of the IETF 118 Prague meeting, as an experiment. This will allow for 8 more WG/RG sessions, which should be sufficient to meet expected demand.

In making this decision, the IESG considered three other options and consulted with the IETF Administration LLC (IETF LLC):

1. Adding another track - rejected that as it would increase the number of session conflicts, which is already too high.  This was experimented with in IETF 111 and the feedback in the post-meeting survey was not favorable.    
   
2.  Adding a late evening session mid-week - rejected on advice from the IETF LLC that this would introduce too many practical problems for staffing and venue contracts.

3.  Starting earlier in the day - rejected as the morning time is important for ad-hoc conversations, side meetings and leadership sessions.  Again, this is supported by evidence from post-meeting surveys.

The IESG is still to decide on the exact timing and how to allocate a Friday afternoon session, as it expected that some WGs/RGs will specifically request not to meet in this session.


Please send any feedback or questions to the IESG at iesg@ietf.org

-- 
Jay Daley
IETF Executive Director
exec-director@ietf.org