[regext] EAI in EPP from a registrar point of view

Dmitry Belyavsky <beldmit@gmail.com> Thu, 19 November 2020 09:03 UTC

Return-Path: <beldmit@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 017D33A1242 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 01:03:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RyFwWt3n4lZS for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 01:03:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62c.google.com (mail-ej1-x62c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E8B83A1238 for <regext@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 01:03:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id lv15so976022ejb.12 for <regext@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 01:03:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=gCqtFezZ+AW2cVyUErqBxldTulYKbpk2TeUBIo/cTtI=; b=o/WJMwrf7Y+5AJWTMHPNhtYdXu3aa4rR7a28JQ7jkTO8wID2pOQOcajOAb3bnaXLDa XKfSUWUVhqI2wo+zEc9byh1ufOEt95gjDFCFjgaHOw6xUhJdN6+616J7Sr4CKlFtz7pc b0k/wyyMlQF+xjBwCEpWjkAzqc3hJJ+2pSMCLKe9Lm7A7Ir7FJFOQkiQGEuqxWyRP3mm XGABxCUpPQLaxXIdA0yl+OqrUG2F/H2gFIxTKdP2VLDe7Uv9sh6aKDE1O6Do1ptaCIvs 6mrg9jJfAy6QOT1hGiuh442vvXtibbx5vubXZsLLCLXBblKNJBwpJaxWXXdTVo/hBABz QQMw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=gCqtFezZ+AW2cVyUErqBxldTulYKbpk2TeUBIo/cTtI=; b=TlFWC0IF7uOsqfhEjOmMPbBachkii5/3LaR04AD6vefuz5xi+/wPELwZQEpuvVDTEo e8zudEmcsmW8USu63ixoFExhTkJOujRCVTyfL4eixrVBg0KsItYp8eAvUXVVnmRZlNlF t8EtAjomJHaspDZe+8y/jtw3BjH3b0gnwhkCY5a8J6paD1asZ5KFlr/K1JasoDwhsowl bdaolsTWCquLycrcFLpQtPZXgIovxRuO79+9W3I3wgi+OqDUGJfuEH+otHE5nrEnlIbb 2ti6Q/p9LKju7pltHCzicMGaS27H53fYFTvNGomE+1uaGsGd3dV6zcigvgwrV7LCZcrs 0YOw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533PXW2nZDKInm+cMA6ODQdNFnaUBUbnTm7lbaNlqJO77IEWMFa/ W6xE01pAHp1Pkr30Hx0vLHpuhWdoFzoEAYhi7TppUN2/AUQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzCUFy7Q3rH0Nwg2fBwtnBxTaBpMGJqKKG9A9pr+oKWeXko0ayHYkdAbu9E/KeifJkX/UB45D+8dW2BCrk4aGM=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c1c3:: with SMTP id bw3mr26237221ejb.126.1605776603430; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 01:03:23 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Dmitry Belyavsky <beldmit@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 12:03:11 +0300
Message-ID: <CADqLbz+VPXYAgrCQY9g-0_vuUxioY7H6GApt4ek2u3gJHXqMPg@mail.gmail.com>
To: regext@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000009459705b47200d4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/6ujMla-PfmjYEq_ecuuGNv1eQRI>
Subject: [regext] EAI in EPP from a registrar point of view
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 09:03:27 -0000

Hello,

I think it's worth providing some thoughts about the EAI support in EPP
from a registrar's perspective.

>From a registrar's perspective, when the registry provides some feature,
the registrar has to support it in most cases. When a registry supports
EAI, the registrar should be ready to at least get an EAI address in the
<info> command on transfer.

Registrars usually got accreditation for working with more than one
registry, and have to write some registry-specific code. In the case of
EAI, the changes should require at least accepting EAI addresses from the
clients not having the ASCII ones and some mechanism providing the valid
ASCII email address in the case when such client wants to register a domain
in a registry that does not support EAI.

-- 
SY, Dmitry Belyavsky