[regext] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag-04: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Wed, 01 August 2018 23:06 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag@ietf.org, James Gould <jgould@verisign.com>, regext-chairs@ietf.org, jgould@verisign.com, regext@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <153316476800.22044.5089072454865967134.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2018 16:06:08 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/946A0-aDkZxFriFotfEuMxUtleU>
Subject: [regext] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag-04: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag-04: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm also a little surprised to see this as a BCP. It seems to define at least a
bit of protocol as part of the "practice".

§3.1: Does the FCFS registration policy allow a potential for squatting or
other malicious behavior?

[regext] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-iet… Ben Campbell
Re: [regext] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft… Hollenbeck, Scott