[regext] Limit parameter in sorting-and-paging draft

Mario Loffredo <mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it> Mon, 03 February 2020 13:15 UTC

Return-Path: <mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8592E1200C4 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 05:15:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fWsb2evBzjex for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 05:14:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.iit.cnr.it (mx4.iit.cnr.it [146.48.98.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 628C0120096 for <regext@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 05:14:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.iit.cnr.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id D735AB804B1; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 14:14:56 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mx4.iit.cnr.it
Received: from smtp.iit.cnr.it ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx4.iit.cnr.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ODusB-GF7vTh; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 14:14:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.12.193.108] (pc-loffredo.nic.it [192.12.193.108]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.iit.cnr.it (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 636EEB804AF; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 14:14:54 +0100 (CET)
To: "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>
Cc: Karl Heinz Wolf <khwolf1@gmail.com>
From: Mario Loffredo <mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it>
Message-ID: <ce5e685f-a8c5-5747-df60-22a6a82e2b8b@iit.cnr.it>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 14:12:54 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: it
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/EUf3H63m_1U556l9v1nxR4Ou4VY>
Subject: [regext] Limit parameter in sorting-and-paging draft
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2020 13:15:01 -0000

Hi folks,

as a consequence of Karl Heinz's review of sorting-and-paging, I'd like 
to know your opinion about the need of a new parameter, namely "limit", 
enabling clients to send their preference about the maximum number of 
objects to be returned in response to a search query.

Do you think it would be useful?


Thanks in advance,

Mario


-- 
Dr. Mario Loffredo
Systems and Technological Development Unit
Institute of Informatics and Telematics (IIT)
National Research Council (CNR)
via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 PISA, Italy
Phone: +39.0503153497
Mobile: +39.3462122240
Web: http://www.iit.cnr.it/mario.loffredo