Re: [regext] DOODLE: select your documents

["James Galvin" <[e-mail]>]

Thanks Scott, for your question.  I have also gotten a few private 
questions about details of how “selections” will be interpreted and 
acted upon.  Rather than respond to your specific question let me make a 
general statement that I have made privately to a few folks.

Antoin and I are not trying to make this a particularly formal process.  
The IETF generally and certainly this working group specifically are 
guided by consensus.  It is our intention to interpret any results as 
broadly as possible.  We will certainly explain our decision process 
with any announcement of results.  If there are questions or concerns 
then we’ll address them, including the possibility of trying something 
different if this path doesn’t yield a consensus.

Of course, any decision we propose will be subject to approval by the 
working group.

We’re all working together to progress the work that is most 
interesting to the most people.

Hopefully no one will create entries that are problematic, hint hint!  
Note that folks can choose to edit their entry, until the Doodle is 
closed, or even add a second entry with a comment at the moment 
explaining which is preferred.

Of course anonymous entries will be problematic.  Please don’t do 
that.  If you do we’ll probably look at results both with and without 
your entries.  If that creates a problem then we’ll have to ask the 
working group to help us resolve the issue.

To everyone, please be fair and reasonable.  Antoin and I will do our 
best to do the same.

Thanks,

Jim






On 2 Jan 2019, at 9:55, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: regext <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of James Galvin
>> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2018 11:13 AM
>> To: Registration Protocols Extensions <[e-mail]>
>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] DOODLE: select your documents
>>
>> Please take the time to select the documents you support for 
>> advancement
>> in this working group.
>>
>> https://doodle.com/poll/6nyguby3yr8dx9cp
>>
>> Please select from 1-5 documents.
>
> Jim, how do you propose to address submissions that contain more than 
> five "green checkmark" selections?
>
> Scott