[regext] Re: [Ext] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-15

[Gavin Brown <[e-mail]>]

Hi Wes,

>> Policy changes will almost certainly only happen infrequently, and the
>> omission was intentional on my point. Do you feel it warrants some
>> discussion in the document?
> 
> I think inserting a warning note would be helpful to the reader.
> Something along the lines of "Although a client is requesting a
> particular TTL value that is within the current acceptable range,
> registries are not obligated to maintain that value indefinitely and may
> change the value when, for example, they update their acceptable TTL
> value ranges."

In my working draft[1] I have added a new Section 5.3, which says:

"Registry operators may change their policies relating to TTL values from time to time. Previously configured TTL values may consequently fall outside a newly-applied policy. This document places no obligation on EPP server operators in respect of these values, and server operators may, as part of a policy change, change the TTL values specified by clients for domain and host objects. Section 4 describes how such out-of-band changes should be carried out."

Let me know what you think. If it looks good I can upload a new version.

G.

[1] https://github.com/gbxyz/epp-ttl-extension/commit/b8bf5d56779fb5a0123401558fd6cab654348c85#diff-e81d8d738f47db9115098e0fe66a7a9904ca10821206e12ff5229e5e384b648cR577

--
Gavin Brown
Principal Engineer, Global Domains & Strategy
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

https://www.icann.org