Re: [regext] Re-chartering REGEXT?

kowalik@denic.de Thu, 18 April 2024 10:22 UTC

Return-Path: <kowalik@denic.de>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 786B4C14F726 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 03:22:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=denic.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZjC1uMYdNvhR for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 03:22:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout-b-206.mailbox.org (mout-b-206.mailbox.org [195.10.208.51]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76625C14F6BD for <regext@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 03:22:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [10.196.197.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-b-206.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VKv2s03kBz9tss for <regext@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 12:21:57 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=denic.de; s=MBO0001; t=1713435717; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/OFyrDSsm7BYjoADCXPQ7DsX1yGC/ztEa++2Hu4Q6B4=; b=ogqYfrKjqngkDuvWUI4EIxq5ORL1poo214S4WxSYWlZF7g9Foxhv4DKk7WyHL1YDR9cWlq suxTU1AoMZfZvPE/NceD0BB7+7gDEkOImMw5jLxvw3H1HX0x+gdKhmOcn0OliDbEJDnbCv ZIeECRMFXVSjECnE22KHYylEEz44watSs0SJoHNZi3KkneAlJbn6OTiWP2I6r4p4P2SKCd lZZh1bt8VibUurga85qZjcVCeAWE3DLUlf/jideTCTsGVyCafrpkIfIwc6TH9L11FK/tPo pE2CUl1RUB0q35kgUuhTb1dCu21I+axi39FCmBGBz929PSSMasmrdfY7KUSqug==
Message-ID: <91196250-3c29-495e-b6ca-3c1e97e39020@denic.de>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 12:21:55 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: kowalik@denic.de
To: regext@ietf.org
References: <50556621-BBB1-41D8-A167-96508F5FF0C6@sidn.nl> <CAAQiQRezKGVaSdqb9nRKhw3Jdd+0R=Tikhe0hQgsq8vMcGGTgQ@mail.gmail.com> <92D7BA88-CC1C-4A5E-9407-BCAE029FAFA3@verisign.com> <CAKr6gn1H2fDcwyWN4L-_hOQY9O2biBwD07udQ=VHpAg4F1J2mQ@mail.gmail.com> <7d11998d3bb3485f977275aa66263610@verisign.com> <79420B05-25C3-467A-BFB5-8DFA18751C20@viagenie.ca>
Content-Language: en-GB, de-DE
In-Reply-To: <79420B05-25C3-467A-BFB5-8DFA18751C20@viagenie.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-512"; boundary="------------ms070105030100080007000208"
X-MBO-RS-ID: 688408d85a463e49d9d
X-MBO-RS-META: 34gwsuyhjqjii1nwifygbh19gxeapgtj
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/MDIdWOQ4RUGmoG5FNII121c5H9I>
Subject: Re: [regext] Re-chartering REGEXT?
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 10:22:07 -0000

+1.

Even better if this milestone and discussion would be possible to take 
place within the current charter or within the re-chartering process.

Kind Regards,

Pawel


On 16.04.24 17:12, Marc Blanchet wrote:
> It appears to me that we are putting the carriage before the horse in this discussion. I would suggest to write a milestone like “a RESTy EPP” but not too much details to leave room for what it will finally be, and leave the discussion on how it is implemented,  how much it is really an EPP transport or not, to the wg mailing list, meetings, and documents.
>
> Regards, Marc.
>
>> Le 16 avr. 2024 à 11:02, Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenbeck=40verisign.com@dmarc.ietf.org> a écrit :
>>
>> I think there's a basic question to be answered first: what's the goal?
>>
>> If the answer is "a RESTful API for EPP", it might be possible to do that within the confines of the existing charter if it can be done without changing any of the existing core EPP RFCs. There's an old axiom about the IETF not standardizing APIs, but we've already done RDAP. Maybe this is similar.
>>
>> If the answer is "specify a web service that's EPP-ish", I agree that rechartering is probably necessary.
>>
>> Scott
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: regext <regext-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of George Michaelson
>>> Sent: Monday, April 15, 2024 7:15 PM
>>> To: regext@ietf.org
>>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Re-chartering REGEXT?
>>>
>>> Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links
>>> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
>>> safe.
>>>
>>> I don't think the new protocol is just a new transport *LAYER* but I also do
>>> support re-charter to include consideration of this protocol suite.
>>>
>>> My reasoning is that we're the people who are going to wind up having to talk
>>> about it. Of course it's irritating from a perspective of RDAP and EPP
>>> proponents to see more work jammed into this WG and I actually generally
>>> dislike charter extension, but the context is clear:
>>>
>>> The protocol is in the registry-registrar and client-registrar interaction space we
>>> work on.
>>>
>>> G
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 3:37 AM Gould, James
>>> <jgould=40verisign.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>>> Andy,
>>>>
>>>> REPP is not a transport, but a new provisioning protocol that is not
>>> supported in the existing charter.  If you believe REPP is a transport, please
>>> describe how it complies with section 2.1 of RFC 5730.
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> JG
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> James Gould
>>>> Fellow Engineer
>>>> jgould@Verisign.com
>>>> <applewebdata://13890C55-AAE8-4BF3-A6CE-
>>> B4BA42740803/jgould@Verisign.c
>>>> om>
>>>>
>>>> 703-948-3271
>>>> 12061 Bluemont Way
>>>> Reston, VA 20190
>>>>
>>>> Verisign.com
>>>> <http://secure-
>>> web.cisco.com/10VTAY9gOxn3SyGCbx0Iw10mjg42vKiJd9gTlNVhf
>>>> 28244PWyM4jb2c-ibruKGejaYoPvmqmnSM9Z2eNTlzxMBoW7sZ23A5-
>>> 6ZDa51f4CX1aG2k
>>> D89FjLRT5lrZaVa9cMZxyPuSEYmYARHamAXBNMOFMXHHnujQGPhAF2M8id
>>> 1FtuOAGKUZx_
>>>> 9lN0uy8-nt1j1GSUq_MDc4bXP3HycIzx_GA3O2pl8aT3qQv-
>>> UMzd2TyyR6F9rxo3by0Gxd
>>>> nKWY4K-F9kROR8T3Y8pcLSeN_xYzXCTdgqo-
>>> ReR6LfvzIrlt1RqQuo4CdEXYRT7bpkT1Oz
>>>> /http%3A%2F%2Fverisigninc.com%2F>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 4/15/24, 1:20 PM, "regext on behalf of Andrew Newton (andy)"
>>> <regext-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:regext-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of
>>> andy@hxr.us <mailto:andy@hxr.us>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click
>>> links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
>>> content is safe.
>>>>
>>>> Maarten,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think proposing some charter text is a good idea.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And I support this if the charter is to be used to exclude some
>>>> proposals for EPP transports but not others, as has been argued.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -andy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 11:59 PM Maarten Wullink
>>>> <maarten.wullink=40sidn.nl@dmarc.ietf.org
>>> <mailto:40sidn.nl@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
>>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> The REGEXT WG charter seems to be limited to only allow work on EPP
>>> extensions?
>>>>> The WG preliminary consensus is that updating the charter for new
>>> transports (requires RFC5730, sec 2.1 compliance) is not required.
>>>>> Because a new transport is regarded as a type of extension, so for anything
>>> else we would need to update the charter?
>>>>> This means there is no defined process anywhere, currently, for EPP
>>>>> related work, such as RESTful EPP (or anything else that is not a extension),
>>> which according to some in this WG is not a transport but something else.
>>>>> RESTful EPP does not require modification of the EPP RFCs, it does include
>>> support for alternative data representations such as JSON.
>>>>> The participants of this WG are the experts in this area, and the right people
>>> to also work on improvements and/or enhancements of the EPP protocol and
>>> new work such as RESTful EPP.
>>>>> Therefore, I propose that we expand the charter of this WG to also include
>>> the above-mentioned activities e.g. not strictly limiting the WG to extensions
>>> only.
>>>>> I’m willing to help in updating the charter if this something we agree on
>>> doing.
>>>>> Best,
>>>>>
>>>>> Maarten
>>>>>
>>>>> ------
>>>>> ps:
>>>>>
>>>>> The previous version of the charter included text, that did allow work on
>>> more than extensions only:
>>>>> “The working group may also, in consultation with its responsible
>>>>> area director, take on work related to the operation of Internet
>>>>> identifier registries, beyond the EPP and RDAP protocols.”
>>>>>
>>>>> See:
>>>>> https://secure-
>>> web.cisco.com/1pZ9xY4B2hhezD1LASpYU9C9QLU_I8ijwDhrAON
>>>>> iX2WujSy1_vkXH6R3dC-
>>> XOs3hs8GhnjSqn4hoIrURMcauciMp2aW9yObvXrtcQfNn5y3
>>> 9QAI_y_nrDueqrchdGrckElb2y8uY6jnSOVocfgGUy3JGWGYYRDY4eaaVGYW4p
>>> 0HCiWX
>>>>> l_U-V5l_hWGXcSEavgzX-crhYmdNvhH-
>>> u2THur7He9dDY47ixzEm4kaOgHenXF4Mjj6X
>>> w63FB7TA6StLsEn1cH4ZzXrkRso6sqhMOPIxW0M12SiAp3Az1rqdgYd_E/http
>>> s%3A%2
>>>>> F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fcharter-ietf-regext%2F01-00%2F
>>>>> <https://secure-
>>> web.cisco.com/1pZ9xY4B2hhezD1LASpYU9C9QLU_I8ijwDhrAO
>>>>> NiX2WujSy1_vkXH6R3dC-
>>> XOs3hs8GhnjSqn4hoIrURMcauciMp2aW9yObvXrtcQfNn5y
>>> 39QAI_y_nrDueqrchdGrckElb2y8uY6jnSOVocfgGUy3JGWGYYRDY4eaaVGYW4
>>> p0HCiW
>>>>> Xl_U-V5l_hWGXcSEavgzX-crhYmdNvhH-
>>> u2THur7He9dDY47ixzEm4kaOgHenXF4Mjj6
>>> Xw63FB7TA6StLsEn1cH4ZzXrkRso6sqhMOPIxW0M12SiAp3Az1rqdgYd_E/htt
>>> ps%3A%
>>>>> 2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fcharter-ietf-regext%2F01-00%2F>
>>>>>
>>>>> This was modified for the current charter, but still not very specific and may
>>> allow for work on RESTful EPP?
>>>>> "The working group may also take on work to develop specifications
>>>>> that describe the following types of information exchanged between
>>>>> entities involved in Internet identifier registration that are using
>>>>> the RDAP or EPP protocols:
>>>>> • Uniform representation formats for publishing local policy or
>>>>> configuration options regarding EPP and RDAP use.
>>>>> • Data formats for files exchanged between registration entities
>>>>> that need insertion in or extraction from EPP or RDAP.
>>>>> • Technical guidance for registration processes that are supported
>>>>> by EPP or RDAP.”
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> regext mailing list
>>>>> regext@ietf.org <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
>>>>> https://secure-
>>> web.cisco.com/1KvgG0690znrXWuB3hdtOx8bFSBFJMVkNZ5g8zP
>>> MeStofdEIwM5iRQBNJUcSsE6gROXlW9ce2rNNyP9JIFNMdD3qAJa8xrA2wKLF
>>> akvQ61D
>>> RHxQLVjdwPbxzo5BV1itYp75wcGjQk4CwDA0lQI54wUygUhug3rcMp5yeQb9
>>> _PLgXgM8
>>>>> eklr87_hvlNWXU_-41hgJWbb4kMACk-
>>> BRDzKtZHXPAUm6b27OZrVUNee4FpEbr5z2Zmh
>>>>> GFmjGtaGbOFxjlmkUq5FUncipetsTP1KpPA-
>>> g33rNu37yQBieczmC5kkY/https%3A%2
>>>>> F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fregext
>>>>> <https://secure-
>>> web.cisco.com/1KvgG0690znrXWuB3hdtOx8bFSBFJMVkNZ5g8z
>>> PMeStofdEIwM5iRQBNJUcSsE6gROXlW9ce2rNNyP9JIFNMdD3qAJa8xrA2wKL
>>> FakvQ61
>>> DRHxQLVjdwPbxzo5BV1itYp75wcGjQk4CwDA0lQI54wUygUhug3rcMp5yeQb
>>> 9_PLgXgM
>>>>> 8eklr87_hvlNWXU_-41hgJWbb4kMACk-
>>> BRDzKtZHXPAUm6b27OZrVUNee4FpEbr5z2Zm
>>>>> hGFmjGtaGbOFxjlmkUq5FUncipetsTP1KpPA-
>>> g33rNu37yQBieczmC5kkY/https%3A%
>>>>> 2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fregext>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> regext mailing list
>>>> regext@ietf.org <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
>>>> https://secure-
>>> web.cisco.com/1KvgG0690znrXWuB3hdtOx8bFSBFJMVkNZ5g8zPMe
>>> StofdEIwM5iRQBNJUcSsE6gROXlW9ce2rNNyP9JIFNMdD3qAJa8xrA2wKLFakv
>>> Q61DRHxQ
>>> LVjdwPbxzo5BV1itYp75wcGjQk4CwDA0lQI54wUygUhug3rcMp5yeQb9_PLgX
>>> gM8eklr87
>>>> _hvlNWXU_-41hgJWbb4kMACk-
>>> BRDzKtZHXPAUm6b27OZrVUNee4FpEbr5z2ZmhGFmjGtaG
>>>> bOFxjlmkUq5FUncipetsTP1KpPA-
>>> g33rNu37yQBieczmC5kkY/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ie
>>>> tf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fregext
>>>> <https://secure-
>>> web.cisco.com/1KvgG0690znrXWuB3hdtOx8bFSBFJMVkNZ5g8zPM
>>> eStofdEIwM5iRQBNJUcSsE6gROXlW9ce2rNNyP9JIFNMdD3qAJa8xrA2wKLFak
>>> vQ61DRHx
>>> QLVjdwPbxzo5BV1itYp75wcGjQk4CwDA0lQI54wUygUhug3rcMp5yeQb9_PL
>>> gXgM8eklr8
>>>> 7_hvlNWXU_-41hgJWbb4kMACk-
>>> BRDzKtZHXPAUm6b27OZrVUNee4FpEbr5z2ZmhGFmjGta
>>>> GbOFxjlmkUq5FUncipetsTP1KpPA-
>>> g33rNu37yQBieczmC5kkY/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.i
>>>> etf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fregext>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> regext mailing list
>>>> regext@ietf.org
>>>> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1D0Tq_GXiIN4Z2FKElYhxl8f-
>>> orxRNy6qSMpHUfKK
>>> QBDULJas_XL2jaCJh8sPN4Jnvglu7_qVHK9tDK4m13QKgWqw1TfhejL4tbxhT2
>>> KaR9hdAl
>>> SZK8SzRYpUJxz6e1HUj7wQqKB6Ddsk9YvBLj3ZYRpL1aooJCUOv5WRxnxbRdlG
>>> R568g1hO
>>>> 0GxFPH7gdfT-wVTrpiLbgcA80j163vTPg6XScic7apv2-
>>> uxH6PmiHhniI0S7HOBWggvyDd
>>> ymhHEyIKjl0VBrj241hwWtsGVrrgux981psezLUf6xTDpDZxkvwNdxyrHfZN1kg
>>> CA_WARX
>>>> /https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fregext
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> regext mailing list
>>> regext@ietf.org
>>> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1D0Tq_GXiIN4Z2FKElYhxl8f-
>>> orxRNy6qSMpHUfKKQBDULJas_XL2jaCJh8sPN4Jnvglu7_qVHK9tDK4m13QKg
>>> Wqw1TfhejL4tbxhT2KaR9hdAlSZK8SzRYpUJxz6e1HUj7wQqKB6Ddsk9YvBLj3Z
>>> YRpL1aooJCUOv5WRxnxbRdlGR568g1hO0GxFPH7gdfT-
>>> wVTrpiLbgcA80j163vTPg6XScic7apv2-
>>> uxH6PmiHhniI0S7HOBWggvyDdymhHEyIKjl0VBrj241hwWtsGVrrgux981psezL
>>> Uf6xTDpDZxkvwNdxyrHfZN1kgCA_WARX/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2
>>> Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fregext
>> _______________________________________________
>> regext mailing list
>> regext@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
> _______________________________________________
> regext mailing list
> regext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext