[regext] Fwd: Datatracker State Update Notice: <draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-11.txt>
Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Tue, 15 October 2019 19:15 UTC
Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9BA7120832 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 12:15:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.478
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.478 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.172, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V3qrgTV5cN_X for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 12:15:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-f49.google.com (mail-io1-f49.google.com [209.85.166.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 969A2120816 for <regext@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 12:15:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-f49.google.com with SMTP id q1so48793976ion.1 for <regext@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 12:15:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=M9jsFUaVJaCWpfeSpOLMtd+GrtcFnUKuVSA9ol8pkhk=; b=LTuhJg/v5yif74msnycRTvqX67WuQlu6FAnwhtw8FZKICbS+Rm0L/nHVvFcgMMz6Qh cXDdi6xgcRhoOgKpRHDdrEm1Bf2k8lMfwfAHQcVJp7g9ikERWQBcjSYk0zlhHTOYF6PM uKy4CD855/Wy3zbD78slL7NxJANHK7/OendfsRysmgaFP4EXEMsqrvzRdHXV4noj1m2M 3uacyRjnNprcXzo+FhcaEcqewAndIfWf1qqmPcUrF8C+kO49ZMypnM96rJIhUPGtkLYC 6GdZmdW2vXWr0mTEblzHWTSNeqGA2eLs7fLfF2+TP2ExRGXezuIFroS1aT0IiLoH104b JkXw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU2U/cQguJlYx62NJs1Vrb5R3vSheQdMItldBSBSfC2+vL/Amyz wtgVH/1fxh/zT6IU0FAG4LQ5dTHPR/GzragYZSi9ASPh
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyoS+jwF1qjJCJWK4aI54k8uVaFvvG9WqVwsbUarfMUK1OJ6ApxTcuORgSDIkkje+KZ2PXlHPuxhvOXdTwOk7o=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:9892:: with SMTP id a18mr8468632ill.266.1571166946464; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 12:15:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <157116559901.28061.1061398353565107916.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <157116559901.28061.1061398353565107916.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 15:15:35 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJK-CtWonECFWWc0v+cTGFBv-JgbHLk=SSoQAegfTos=xg@mail.gmail.com>
To: regext <regext@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/RBX2Mxx1R0qrWKGgtyRlgVFztWc>
Subject: [regext] Fwd: Datatracker State Update Notice: <draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-11.txt>
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 19:15:49 -0000
I have taking this document out of IESG Evaluation state and put it back into Waiting for AD Go-Ahead. Regext working group, please look at the reviews and decide how you want to handle this. The document clearly needs some updates to address the comments we have, but in addition the WG needs to decide to... 1. ...continue processing this as an Informational document (in which case it needs to be made very clear why this is being handled by the working group and not in the Independent stream, or... 2. ...change the intended status to Standards Track and resume processing it as a working group document that way, or... 3. ...stop processing this document (change the WG status to "dead") and recommend to the authors that they take it to the Independent stream. Barry ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org> Date: Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 2:53 PM Subject: Datatracker State Update Notice: <draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-11.txt> To: <barryleiba@gmail.com>, Joseph Yee <jyee@afilias.info>, <regext-chairs@ietf.org>, <draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration@ietf.org>, <barryleiba@computer.org> IESG state changed: New State: Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised I-D Needed (The previous state was IESG Evaluation) Significant issues have been raised that require the working group to decide how to proceed. In particular, the working group needs to decide whether to continue with this document as an Informational product of the working group, to change its intended status to something else, or to abandon it and recommend that the authors take it to the Independent stream. Datatracker URL: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration/
- [regext] Fwd: Datatracker State Update Notice: <d… Barry Leiba
- Re: [regext] Fwd: Datatracker State Update Notice… Patrick Mevzek