Re: [regext] IETF 101 agenda and POSSIBLE RESCEDULING

["James Galvin" <[e-mail]>]

I have just confirmed this evening that they have NOT moved our meeting. 
  The published final agenda is correct.

The REGEXT will meet as follows at IETF101.

Monday, 1740-1840, Park Suite (east wing first floor)
Wednesday, 1520-1650, Richmond/Chelsea/Tower (east wing first floor)

Sorry for the confusion.

Jim





On 10 Mar 2018, at 15:26, Antoin Verschuren wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> Below is our preliminary agenda for our REGEXT IETF 101 meeting that I 
> posted since the agenda was due.
> As you can see, we only received extra items from Roger, and we still 
> have space left on our agenda.
>
> If you have any more items you wish to discuss, please let the chairs 
> know asap!
>
> Also be AWARE of the following:
> We have received a request to reschedule our Wednesday 1520 regular 
> meeting session due to a conflict of another WG.
> The workable options for rescheduling we were presented are Tuesday 
> 0930 or Friday 1150.
> The problem of the Tuesday option is that both Adam our AD, and myself 
> as co-chair have a conflict on Tuesday, but Jim our other co-chair 
> hasn’t.
> However, we feel that the Friday might be a conflict for the WG, as 
> the work meeting on Monday and a regular session on Friday may be too 
> far apart.
> So we opted our first choice to reschedule to Tuesday, and I will 
> sacrifice my remote presence for the benefit of the WG and I will try 
> to follow the meeting over a low bandwidth link.
> We have yet to hear which of the 2 options works best for the IETF, so 
> be aware we may still reschedule to Friday if that’s the only option 
> left.
>
> Preliminary agenda:
>
> Registration Protocols Extensions (REGEXT)
> IETF 101, London, UK, Agenda
>
> Co-chairs: Jim Galvin, Antoin Verschuren
> Mailinglist: [e-mail]
>
> *****************************************
>
> Session I,  Work session.
> Monday 2018-03-19  17:40 - 18:40
>
>       Introduce the Registry Mapping concepts (Roger Carney)
>       This will be a discussion/work session on a new Registry mapping 
> proposal,
>       a new  Policy document that describes all of the variable paths 
> that an
>       extension creates (SHOULD(s), MAY(s), lists, etc).
>
> *****************************************
>
> *****************************************
>
> Session II,  Regular WG meeting session.
> Wednesday 2018-03-21  15:20 - 16:50
>
>
> 1. Welcome and Introductions (5 minutes)
>
>    i.   Jabber scribe
>    ii.  Notes scribe
>    iii. NOTE WELL
>
>
> 2. Existing Document Status
>
>
> 2.a. Published (2 minutes)
>
>    i.  Launch Phase Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
>        RFC 8334 (was draft-ietf-regext-launchphase )
>
>
> 2.b.  Working group (past) last call documents (15 minutes)
>
>    i.   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees/
>         (Roger Carney 10 minutes)
>
>    ii.  
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-change-poll/
>
>    iii. 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-allocation-token/
>
>
> 3.  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-validate/
>     (Roger Carney 10 minutes)
>
>
> 4.  Working session summary (10 minutes)
>
>    i. Introduce the Registry Mapping concepts (Roger Carney)
>
>
> 5.  Milestone status review (Adoption requests, Renaming, Milestones) 
> (20 minutes)
>
>     There are some items that can be closed on our milestone list, and 
> some recently
>     adopted documents that need to be added but we need to discuss the 
> priority and
>     maturity for them. We also want to discuss new documents to adopt.
>     (milestone list / adopted documents overview to be added)
>
>
> 6. AOB
>
> *****************************************
>
> Regards,
>
> Jim and Antoin
>
> - --
> Antoin Verschuren
>
> Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
> M: [phone]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> regext mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext