[regext] Re: Mike Bishop's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-ttl-extension-10: (with COMMENT)

Gavin Brown <gavin.brown@fastmail.uk> Tue, 19 May 2026 13:05 UTC

Return-Path: <gavin.brown@fastmail.uk>
X-Original-To: regext@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: regext@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2818F0B8CC7; Tue, 19 May 2026 06:05:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1779195929; bh=L/pyCm+pNDB+UVcRLuslcQseX9b5RKRJYoEjXeRGna4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject; b=Rs05BfOtUZCGRdUT3xFKSuwcqxETPQnJRDACOwkjwhadg4lyzjJMTDk+UQU81lr0d 99BGiGJMFySRzsk8u9VWEB2wjZQ5G10wrykqCuO6qW12gfhb7UohkfAA0GsPChr2ML E14JUD7TUxgcHgz7x/hhUbhnORsVTwWPMi0TZOWc=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.798
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmail.uk header.b="XcXitsnp"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="gc1N3OD/"
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oMfcL8wS-mSN; Tue, 19 May 2026 06:05:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fout-a2-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a2-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.145]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B360EF0B895C; Tue, 19 May 2026 06:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from phl-compute-12.internal (phl-compute-12.internal [10.202.2.52]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE61EC01EF; Tue, 19 May 2026 09:03:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phl-imap-06 ([10.202.2.83]) by phl-compute-12.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 19 May 2026 09:03:01 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.uk; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1779195781; x=1779282181; bh=HXjl6u4GonYCXSs6qTBRKU5kujBpSqnTSTvKx9OcKPg=; b= XcXitsnpDkmIpThiqjHvie0+K6cBz6XGeMdeFcX/L50XAxww4HxwyTkIw8ft28pf q+Z66uluK5QZBrKixjoZGrNmo9oc+1YnnrEndabcgz0YU3bsY2wvR4jKT5qyKSfk 39ddfzkexnEn8Bxb7hPUT3E3oX4Mz6Re09a3daH11aJ9W+6iZ3YFcqJ1EZB3C7QX YbwQaQ/EStmxCK+QqAHOII4zxIoC8W8thc12irGa4E+uHsphTVkLqY3Yw9CRtVkm /1Zz6+DfNMWn62T6yYQqRTSo8TB+vAoyjmRiufWBM6EWWfwsY+Uj31oWqBv1oj4r 6k/8tuPW+u50TsOCnChp0A==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1779195781; x= 1779282181; bh=HXjl6u4GonYCXSs6qTBRKU5kujBpSqnTSTvKx9OcKPg=; b=g c1N3OD/rfkJ7ItSHtNIAFmPn6prJbt4QO9Ph2O3HBtl9GRFui8VWZAPZjXaeGkUs OKA0a1EFm6n9HnAqrExm8UvsKXLMTcSDs4KR3XzpHmvtPXuNsLBDF1550Kvh9xCe 5YQZ55JWJUN5kvuOm9yViDr5yKqN+9qxK9k+g98MXBUTAl2f+xsoVjHVFvpAaObG U7i6VEmtGQq6htMmCMvdSY6wMYWxyg/SZb/6DiARvv00UUnbQSfuMI4ZqsWviLTB qTY0p+/zCc5HNpUv8SW2wCDs+Zz0TkbLopFRDj/1MrQXZ0kXEIP+DSHJ86Fw8byr B3Ks2u81vFe0T9GdkPceQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:hF8Mau8MJHS0HyWRxJYJCPRI-VD28Uk2ptFyIVTOjtRqgnGtExUx1g> <xme:hF8MapgP2-D526w7BxhDVM8ty5Z_46mR3xIDo4B0QZPkV7X0QcH0d2wgDnIRJ_70t C86mNnSD8f5OMvmfu00_7G2dn_3eoJPP9Xd4-qeN3rzEO9lipRobE4l>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefhedrtddtgddugedukedvucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujf gurhepofggfffhvfevkfgjfhfutgfgsehtjeertdertddtnecuhfhrohhmpedfifgrvhhi nhcuuehrohifnhdfuceoghgrvhhinhdrsghrohifnhesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdhukheqne cuggftrfgrthhtvghrnheptdehjeelgfeljeelgedvkeeuheetuddtueelhefhudeuueei jeefkefffffffedunecuffhomhgrihhnpehivghtfhdrohhrghdpghhithhhuhgsrdgtoh hmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepghgr vhhinhdrsghrohifnhesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdhukhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepiedpmh houggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtohepmhgsihhshhhophesvghvvghquhgvfhho uhdrsggvpdhrtghpthhtohepughrrghfthdqihgvthhfqdhrvghgvgigthdqrhgurghpqd htthhlqdgvgihtvghnshhiohhnsehivghtfhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehivghsghes ihgvthhfrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtoheprhgvghgvgihtqdgthhgrihhrshesihgvthhfrd horhhgpdhrtghpthhtoheprhgvghgvgihtsehivghtfhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehm mhgrlhgrnhhgkhhhrgguvghrsehvvghrihhsihhgnhdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:hF8MahTgppUSxjbfd1tY_P8xXfKj87yiFHbda3FXp_ptkrKr2akcgg> <xmx:hF8MauehQIfF8fVfErDBsyGvCmBRbRfzdUW7tbwEiVlMMdg3lW891A> <xmx:hF8MagrUsYMnkSQ56mEWkBl-y8_Ub8Sy8D6HzS7RYtDfKDMTSqR6RQ> <xmx:hF8Mav-zXeDV2seqJK-jGNPz04FNJE9hHRb0_-cAzRmK5ds8rPDFbg> <xmx:hV8Majk4Umgv1-U-MdDOMHyaiuE6XiNRPLtgbzkAeySsaQEyCb7XHvHR>
Feedback-ID: i7eb94462:Fastmail
Received: by mailuser.phl.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id D0D58240009A; Tue, 19 May 2026 09:03:00 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-ThreadId: AmUt2Cc5ZJGo
Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 14:02:40 +0100
From: Gavin Brown <gavin.brown@fastmail.uk>
To: Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <8036371a-e5aa-4d6d-9d27-2003dfc917aa@app.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <177912852690.554519.16853696477612922377@dt-datatracker-7688897f84-l74h4>
References: <177912852690.554519.16853696477612922377@dt-datatracker-7688897f84-l74h4>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID-Hash: PAPKJXNZOJRFFQPXA6WUAHW43F5J2E5J
X-Message-ID-Hash: PAPKJXNZOJRFFQPXA6WUAHW43F5J2E5J
X-MailFrom: gavin.brown@fastmail.uk
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-regext.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "draft-ietf-regext-rdap-ttl-extension@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-regext-rdap-ttl-extension@ietf.org>, mmalangkhader@verisign.com, regext-chairs@ietf.org, "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [regext] Re: Mike Bishop's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-ttl-extension-10: (with COMMENT)
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions Working Group <regext.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/Zfrbms_owhz48P86HjTbcs5WXFs>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:regext-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:regext-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:regext-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Mike, thanks for your review! The next version will fix these issues.

On Mon, 18 May 2026, at 19:22, Mike Bishop via Datatracker wrote:
> Mike Bishop has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-regext-rdap-ttl-extension-10: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to 
> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-ttl-extension/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> # IESG review of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-ttl-extension-10
>
> CC @MikeBishop
>
> ## Comments
>
> ### Section 1, paragraph 1
>
> A sentence expanding RDAP (Registration Data Access Protocol) and
> giving a brief definition/description would be helpful context.
>
> ### Section 3, paragraph 3
>
> This implies that all records of a given type have the same TTL across
> a given domain. Is that necessarily the case?
>
> ## Nits
>
> All comments below are about very minor potential issues that you may choose to
> address in some way - or ignore - as you see fit. Some were flagged by
> automated tools (via https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool) so there
> will likely be some false positives. There is no need to let me know what you
> did with these suggestions.
>
> ### Typos
>
> #### Section 8.1, paragraph 3
> ```
> -    2.  Made [RFC9499] a normative reference (thanks Ketan Talaulika)
> +    2.  Made [RFC9499] a normative reference (thanks Ketan Talaulikar)
> +                                                                    +
> ```
>
> #### Section 9, paragraph 2
> ```
> -    K.  Gurbani, Di Ma, Nabeel Cocker, Ketan Talaulika.
> +    K.  Gurbani, Di Ma, Nabeel Cocker, Ketan Talaulikar.
> +                                                      +
> ```
>
> ### Grammar/style
>
> #### Section 3, paragraph 3
> ```
> ection 8 of [RFC2181], a TTL value is a "an unsigned number, with a minimum v
>                                       ^
> ```
> Use "an" instead of "a" if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g.
> "an article", "an hour".
>
> You don't need an article both inside and outside the quotes.
>
> #### Section 3, paragraph 4
> ```
> 483647. That is, a maximum of 2^31 - 1.". TTL values are represented as JSON
>                                      ^^^^
> ```
> Unless punctuating an abbreviation or acronym, periods should not appear both
> inside and outside of a quote.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to regext-leave@ietf.org