Re: [regext] Shepherd's nits on draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces
"Gould, James" <jgould@verisign.com> Mon, 07 December 2020 18:32 UTC
Return-Path: <jgould@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C47313A00D9 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 10:32:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=verisign.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n1xepo2gY-e8 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 10:31:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail1.verisign.com (mail1.verisign.com [72.13.63.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55E703A005D for <regext@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 10:31:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=verisign.com; l=29326; q=dns/txt; s=VRSN; t=1607365921; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=kxraGxNfL7ysODJfFMIanhdULoXOhs6//7teGZrAY6k=; b=X4R/Rw5igp+gSkZQ+Rrjc1000F7VWH/h+pMZuzfIQTqJpEKVdw5Ce18f C9ReRV9U9vs/TPfreS4JsI+rxJk7qCUZ1CDNdunhK5BXw2eMYBxT6LsuL WEOV8tCPXOjonRIvok4g+gZaeaJ4cQZHqinHZHDugATN1wXib89NKo9Wf izViWQsX4PA16cH2p3PQHkOzEho4J9GtFw5kj9c5IbrP8gZjjOA/yKiXE ACCxAOWSarjp28/Uv6WkpS2u5bPXUQKbErOM7eJytsJB9s3gsq0wXFdBM WwmuHpJLmQe6iBHhdI3qzZj5wjNhs7kaKVL0GRso4nGt/H78GpsOij1LO g==;
IronPort-SDR: aKKZrU5sXYBvTiBbuuLaRLqYESS5tnd+TufUowy09wLJLBPWcAWltVByzgDZndFnmn2NcL7sZL 5dGbTuIFZ5jEXZH4PH5chSJPnXKshGmjHELhTKsG0/Ll6sjzMIG49Sa6LMj2DXPTYfATJlSNjT aDsH5duqHazujBpukRf9u5akTO/P8iRIFR1hFv5hISgX7t22ViHRRPVIhLUQLZGdoapw4k+Snq PzOXWgYC/jZQyGQ6ILC942CnEHrga2kQDFaMhyNT1QV4bD1Db2RefrFeMd2HN/f7cuB2COJ3c5 nvw=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,400,1599523200"; d="png'150?scan'150,208,217,150";a="4474694"
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23: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
X-IPAS-Result: A2FDBABNdM5f/zCZrQpfA4N7gXyBOAqEM5EnA4MXZZd6PAQHAQEBAQEBAQEBBAEDAR8QBAEBAoRIGYIAJjgTAgMBAQsBAQEFAQEBAQEGAwEBAQKGTgyCNykBcz0NPQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQUCCAdNB0cBHgEDAwUBHQICBgFdAQgRAwECBgEBAQ4BEwIEBRABDgwdCgQBEQEGCIMYAa8Hdn8zhD4BgRiFDBCBOIMmg0OBOYELhC+BQj6BOByCVT6CXQSBRS8JASYBAoJNM4IsBIJDFUsEDQc+ImMSK04BI5MOhyiBUpBRgxqHF4EGAweCdIc+AoFci3aGLR+ETp1ekgWBbYkREoFmlhUCBAIEBQIVgW2Be3AVZQGCPglHFwINji0Xg06KWHQCDCYDAgYBCQEBAwmKJQ+BJIERAQE
Received: from BRN1WNEX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (10.173.153.48) by BRN1WNEX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (10.173.153.48) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 13:31:57 -0500
Received: from BRN1WNEX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([fe80::a89b:32d6:b967:337d]) by BRN1WNEX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([fe80::a89b:32d6:b967:337d%4]) with mapi id 15.01.2106.002; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 13:31:57 -0500
From: "Gould, James" <jgould@verisign.com>
To: "Smith, David - Dulles" <dsmith@verisign.com>, "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [regext] Shepherd's nits on draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces
Thread-Index: AQHWzMc+RBxSH0O24km4GskDsOO0SQ==
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 18:31:57 +0000
Message-ID: <688EF860-958C-4DD6-9AD3-A66A3AC7DCD5@verisign.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.41.20091302
x-originating-ip: [10.170.148.18]
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="_004_688EF860958C4DD69AD3A66A3AC7DCD5verisigncom_"; type="multipart/alternative"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/g_0bXzXMvfY96HmD0K8aQglxczw>
Subject: Re: [regext] Shepherd's nits on draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 18:32:02 -0000
David, Thank you for your review feedback. All of the nit updates have been made in draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-06. The only change from what you proposed was to use “implementing” instead of “doing” in “the server should consider implementing the following”. The corresponding wording change will be made in “the client should consider implementing the following”. I looked at the indentation of all of the examples and I found a couple other issues that were addressed in draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-06. Thanks, -- JG [cid:image001.png@01D6CC9D.559C0B70] James Gould Fellow Engineer jgould@Verisign.com<applewebdata://13890C55-AAE8-4BF3-A6CE-B4BA42740803/jgould@Verisign.com> 703-948-3271 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 Verisign.com<http://verisigninc.com/> From: regext <regext-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of "Smith, David - Dulles" <dsmith=40verisign.com@dmarc.ietf.org> Date: Thursday, December 3, 2020 at 2:04 PM To: "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] Shepherd's nits on draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces Hi – As the document shepherd for draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces, I reviewed the text of the draft and had the following feedback for consideration. It’s grouped by document section or page number. Abstract "server tof determine" -> "tof" typo 2. Unhandled Namespaces Original: "The unhandled namespaces problem exists when the server has information, that it needs to return to the client, that is not supported by the client" Proposal: "The unhandled namespaces problem exists when the server has information that it needs to return to the client but the namespace of the information is not supported by the client" 3. Use of EPP <extValue> for Unhandled Namespace Data Original: "caused a server error condition, and the <reason> element" Proposal: "caused a server error condition and the <reason> element" Original: "When a server has data to return to the client, that the client" Proposal: "When a server has data to return to the client that the client" [Page 8] The example includes a server response where the <secDNS> child elements are not indented but should be. 4. Signaling Client and Server Support Original: "in the server's Greeting extension services, can expect" Proposal: "in the server's Greeting extension services can expect" Original: "in the client's <login> Command extension services, can expect" Proposal: "in the client's <login> Command extension services can expect" 5. Usage with General EPP Responses Original: "MAY include it under in the <extValue>" Proposal: "MAY include it under the <extValue>" 7.1. Client Implementation Considerations Original: "Ensure that the login services is accurate with what is supported by the client." Proposal: "Ensure that the client presents the complete set of what it supports when presenting its login services" Original: "The unhandled namespace can be implemented" Proposal: "The unhandled namespace should be implemented" 7.2. Server Implementation Considerations Original: "the server should consider the following" Proposal: "the server should consider doing the following"
- [regext] Shepherd's nits on draft-ietf-regext-unh… Smith, David - Dulles
- Re: [regext] Shepherd's nits on draft-ietf-regext… Gould, James