[regext] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-login-security-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

[Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-regext-login-security-07: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-login-security/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Perhaps some simple questions (apologies if I'm missing something obvious):
since there is no registry of custom events, how do developers of independent
implementations know which custom events they should be aiming to support? And
how do they understand the semantics associated with custom events beyond what
the event names can convey?


----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

= Section 5 =

"One schema is presented here that is the EPP Login Security Extension
   schema."

This phrasing seems a little odd (is there more than one schema?). I would
suggest "The EPP Login Security Extension schema is presented here."