IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [regext] EPP and DNAME records?

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Fri, 05 January 2018 11:10 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 683DD1205F0 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jan 2018 03:10:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ce13g7iMylVT for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jan 2018 03:10:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5A1B120227 for <regext@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jan 2018 03:10:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 216E128149D for <regext@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jan 2018 12:10:15 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 500) id 1C7F72814A5; Fri, 5 Jan 2018 12:10:15 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay01.prive.nic.fr (unknown [10.1.50.11]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15EA828149D for <regext@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jan 2018 12:10:15 +0100 (CET)
Received: from b12.nic.fr (b12.users.prive.nic.fr [10.10.86.133]) by relay01.prive.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D70D06427580 for <regext@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jan 2018 12:10:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: by b12.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B4EAB401F8; Fri, 5 Jan 2018 12:10:14 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2018 12:10:14 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: regext@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20180105111014.52tdcpky3hy3imth@nic.fr>
References: <20171112130006.GA31496@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20171112130006.GA31496@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 9.3
X-Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-4-amd64 x86_64
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.2
X-PMX-Version: 6.0.0.2142326, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2018.1.5.105715
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/jpsdwjY4em7bBIidgGDWv1_ZRmg>
Subject: Re: [regext] EPP and DNAME records?
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2018 11:10:19 -0000

On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 09:00:06PM +0800,
 Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> wrote 
 a message of 19 lines which said:

> we could imagine a registry accepting registrations implemented as a
> DNAME record, not NS records.
> 
> Would it make sense to create an extension (may be an addition to RFC
> 5731) to allow these "DNAME registrations"?
> 
> I'll be at the meeting tomorrow, if you prefer to discuss it AFK.

After the discussion in Singapore, here is the draft. Comments and
criticisms are welcome.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bortzmeyer-regext-epp-dname/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email