[regext] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag-04: (with COMMENT)
Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Fri, 27 July 2018 17:51 UTC
Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: regext@ietf.org
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3085131032; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 10:51:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag@ietf.org, James Gould <jgould@verisign.com>, regext-chairs@ietf.org, jgould@verisign.com, regext@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.83.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <153271389685.32575.14236059863408474169.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 10:51:36 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/mYCr4M9sGddJLORknhLRJKLzR0E>
Subject: [regext] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 17:51:37 -0000
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag-04: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I was a little surprised to see that this document targets BCP status, not Proposed Standard. Was there much discussion of this question in the WG? Section 2 Service provider tags are concatenated to the end of RDAP query object identifiers to unambiguously identify the authoritative server It seems like it is the combination of concatenation of the service provider tag, and the use of the rdap_objectTag_level_0 rdapConformance attribute that provides the unambiguous property; I would like to see this caveat made more clear here. Also, per https://www.iab.org/2016/11/07/iab-statement-on-ipv6/, please consider using IPv6 addresses in the examples. Section 5.1 Are all provided URLs supposed to be functionally different? If not, how do we tell which ones do what? Section 7 Perhaps note that it is using IANA as a well-known central trusted authority in order to provide the property of allowing users to get RDAP data from an authoritative source? [...] The method has the same security properties as the RDAP protocols themselves. The transport used to access the IANA registries can be more secure by using TLS [RFC5246], which IANA supports. Well, I don't know that "the same as" is quite right, especially given the following sentence. The composed chain of "talk to iana, talk to referred RDAP server" depends both on the security of the connection to the RDAP server and that of the connection to IANA; it seems prudent to note that if TLS is used for the RDAP connection, TLS should also be used when talking to IANA, or even that TLS should always be used when talking to IANA.
- Re: [regext] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on dra… Hollenbeck, Scott
- Re: [regext] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on dra… Benjamin Kaduk
- [regext] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-i… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [regext] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on dra… Hollenbeck, Scott
- [regext] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-i… Hollenbeck, Scott
- Re: [regext] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on dra… Hollenbeck, Scott
- Re: [regext] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on dra… Benjamin Kaduk