Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid-18.txt

"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com> Mon, 24 October 2022 16:50 UTC

Return-Path: <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C0AEC14CE24 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 09:50:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=verisign.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sUXA94pMpfEG for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 09:50:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.verisign.com (mail1.verisign.com [72.13.63.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90B56C14CF1F for <regext@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 09:50:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=verisign.com; l=2190; q=dns/txt; s=VRSN; t=1666630232; h=from:to:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject; bh=qe7AME9uceKnNZXD9Pq/ndjfPGMpVo+fnyEWLoKWR2M=; b=Cyb4ZRZ2zFV3H50TINMOUzG5DYxEaZ3rK/xYZSfoI9PdUHkXmn44wOjD oY0OS7mBeS+2jJy84hFR7VQ4ckcHKa7wgw3Mbif5dv7fNB36qN0OG2NyO 0FHPFjf9HAKTuuieWtIPJzSSsN3sJQ0/09roplaUNJBIOWeJ0RjiYDLni ZZ3HumwcAsSNzDLm8q6onwq7/uAEeDMA6AnSG8IUFnGji8vjEPTp4FhFV tGJa6jQ7JETmHPWybWJbAF7d56rcTYVVR9lrNXEiLhmznq+yAT7s5muzg +gAwttLsfDhPz8Ybf7NP8n3fz1lTq53pj09bJ3MPsZYJWkRk6BK2PRvDw g==;
IronPort-Data: A9a23:DtzK9qp3v/ulV8ggVAjjynGNQK1eBmJ0ZBIvgKrLsJaIsI4StFCzt garIBmCafeLYGfyc48gYdmz9x8GvZPUn9FkHFE9ry9jFCsV95acVYWSI3mrMnLJJKUvbq7FA +Y2MYCccZ9uHhcwgj/3b9ANeFEljfngqoLUUbKCYGYpLeNdYH9JoQp5nOIkiZJfj9G8Agec0 fv/uMS31GWNglaYCUpJrfPewP9TlK6q4mlB5gZiPaojUGL2zBH5MrpOfcldEFOlGuG4LsbiL 87fwbew+H/u/htFIrtJRZ6iLyXm6paLVeS/oiI+t5qK23CulQRrukoPD8fwXG8M49m/t4sol IgS78zYpTABZcUgkMxFO/VRO38mYf0eoNcrK1Dn2SCY5xWun3cBX5yCpaz5VGEV0r8fPI1Ay RAXAD0GYi2bv/3x/LWqRfVnmsMcLcDmHIxK7xmMzRmBZRonabr5Zfz1w/JohG52mMtJB+6Yb sZfdyB0alLLZBgn1lU/Ucp4xbjzwCCiKHsE+Dp5poJui4TX5Bdx17zpPdzfd9eJbdtYhEeDp 23AuW/+B3n2MfTFkGXUqCry1ocjmwvLU4BOSf6W/MR02nHK/UMRAj5VfFC09KzRZkmWHog3x 1Yv0ikpsqE29U+DQtT7Xhb+rHPslgQRVNdAD8U75R2DjK3O7G6k6nMsRCRHMcMgud9uHHkxy EXPmtLyQDZo9rePTyvb6K2Pq3W5Pi19wXI+WBLohDAtu7HLyLzfRDqWJjq/OMZZVuHIJAw=
IronPort-HdrOrdr: A9a23:SBu7QKBlBclpcMrlHemH55DYdb4zR+YMi2TDj3oBLCC9Afbo8/ xG+85rriMc6QxhIE3I9urgBEDtexnhHNtOkOss1NSZLXPbUQmTTL2KhLGKq1bd8m/Fh41gPM xbH5SWfeefMbEMt6nHCWeDfurIi+P3l5xAzd2uqUuFYzsaEp1d0w==
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.95,209,1661817600"; d="scan'208";a="21792068"
Received: from BRN1WNEX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (10.173.153.49) by BRN1WNEX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (10.173.153.48) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.13; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 12:50:31 -0400
Received: from BRN1WNEX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([10.173.153.49]) by BRN1WNEX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([10.173.153.49]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.013; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 12:50:31 -0400
From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
To: "kowalik@denic.de" <kowalik@denic.de>, "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid-18.txt
Thread-Index: AQHY5Weiia259tEZ5UKYDvvPWCW1jK4d6iyA///cA8A=
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 16:50:30 +0000
Message-ID: <2a20fa1c8b574e95b456481d7b1a9b2e@verisign.com>
References: <c6967e00-d860-a1f4-cd70-ed26bae4f305@denic.de> <05ed620b-7ecf-bfae-1af4-0847850fc8f2@denic.de>
In-Reply-To: <05ed620b-7ecf-bfae-1af4-0847850fc8f2@denic.de>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.170.148.18]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/rhAapEjw7uOLosi-aa5KA5Y9Mtg>
Subject: Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid-18.txt
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 16:50:36 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pawel Kowalik <kowalik@denic.de>
> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2022 10:58 AM
> To: Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenbeck@verisign.com>; regext@ietf.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid-
> 18.txt
>
> Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links
> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
>
> Hi Scott,
>
> Am 19.10.22 um 14:13 schrieb Hollenbeck, Scott:
> >>
> >>>> 1. How do we address web service clients?
> >> [PK] I think the elements we need for web service clients were
> >> already elaborated in the discussion over the version 17.
> >> I'm happy to support with text proposal if needed.
> > [SAH] Text would be appreciated. Something like this perhaps?
> >
> > 4.2.5 Web Service Clients
> >
> > <Paragraph that describes what a web service client is>
> >
> > 4.2.5.1 Web Service Client Login
> >
> > <Query parameters and/or path segment descriptions>
> >
> > 4.2.5.2 Web Service Client Session Management
> >
> > <Query parameters and/or path segment descriptions>
> >
> [PK] Please find attached my draft on Web Service Clients. Most of it is based
> on the concepts of the version 9. Scope "feature" is also included in the
> proposal.

[SAH] Thanks! Would folks PLEASE review section 4.2.5 and share feedback as appropriate?

> Open point would be to add an optional possibility for confidential/registered
> clients and some security considerations.

[SAH] I'm open to suggestions.

Scott