IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [regext] Proposed Changes to Milestones

"Gould, James" <jgould@verisign.com> Tue, 23 May 2017 12:13 UTC

Return-Path: <jgould@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D559D129B11 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 May 2017 05:13:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.103
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.103 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=verisign.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iScSwc_39kqC for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 May 2017 05:13:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.verisign.com (mail1.verisign.com [72.13.63.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 192C4129470 for <regext@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 May 2017 05:13:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=verisign.com; l=2834; q=dns/txt; s=VRSN; t=1495541617; h=from:to:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject; bh=BvswLsNVr1G8S0cSbzm2K1frRCqIp3uXNyCakoMj/Dc=; b=J8l/YPIxN5MiUmwjQ1kxrxS2cOP9X8cYq2Uo4VU32GNHN1LBnT+NBCA7 LkmITly4uT/9/Wz3DkY4VJQ78vDY/B7BLs4hCAVH6FHzddQar41PkQ9dI aEsK1JYGYcLUUHJnACppFcfOwmZYhCz5/IXKGAv7tAvnkjhjEP9FuX2iS HAGvcV8YetjM1dTc4IeHu9dF9g1Pduz7l3kjMI31vuint4tobNE64JXIl 8qiu6yqOfymRV1YhKl1U6fwW7qZMFNpOrCDxr1qLggHUctufU6yFq68Or kkNdwRshC+qOLkfbZ4W5ChNhyOi5jAz6raEaMyjAqZIZZM9vNWsGDS2UR Q==;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.38,382,1491264000"; d="scan'208";a="3324406"
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23: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
X-IPAS-Result: A2H8AADpJiRZ//WZrQpZAxwBAQQBAQoBARcBAQQBAQoBAYQMgQwHg2iKGJF2lXeCDyiFfAIahC4YAQEBAQEBAQEBAQECgRCCMyJ3NwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAR0CCEgBARkBBAEjEVUCAQgNAQwCJgICAjAVEAIEARKKHq5YgiaLRQEBAQEBAQEBAgEBAQEBAQEBAQEBHYELhVWBXSuCcYROFhcKJoJLL4IxBZ4VBgGHH4EEiw2BelWPGJRLH4FDcRVYAYZjdogRgQ0BAQE
Received: from brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexcas02 [10.173.152.206]) by brn1lxmailout02.verisign.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v4NCDZmJ014742 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 23 May 2017 08:13:35 -0400
Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Tue, 23 May 2017 08:13:34 -0400
From: "Gould, James" <jgould@verisign.com>
To: Antoin Verschuren <ietf@antoin.nl>, "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Proposed Changes to Milestones
Thread-Index: AQHS0xEhrohvR9pw5UmQUQ4LJpQCm6IB4mEA///zfYA=
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 12:13:33 +0000
Message-ID: <E9D240D3-C1B7-4B76-83EA-D26A2F17CC1B@verisign.com>
References: <AB96DF97-9F10-4E27-A8EB-68A5BCE0578F@elistx.com> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F73E1C872@BRN1WNEXMBX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <CD0E0F06-E9D4-4D40-ADD8-0B08547307D3@antoin.nl>
In-Reply-To: <CD0E0F06-E9D4-4D40-ADD8-0B08547307D3@antoin.nl>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1f.0.170216
x-originating-ip: [10.170.148.18]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <2210E07FA5581F44BD2648B6DE07DFE0@verisign.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/rnYLZu0HDf3YmXoYuAst0WgrLUM>
Subject: Re: [regext] Proposed Changes to Milestones
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 12:13:39 -0000

To support Antoin, I’m asking for those in the working group to review and provide feedback publically or privately on draft-ietf-regext-change-poll, and to let the authors know of any existing implementations or planned implementations of draft-ietf-regext-change-poll for inclusion in an Implementation Status section.  If would be useful for registrars to weigh in on the importance of registries to implement this extension to proactively inform them of server-side changes (e.g., modifying the statuses of objects based on court orders or based on server policy, deleting unlinked objects).  This extension can handle many use cases, so hopefully more registries implement it and more and more use cases are covered by it.  

Thanks,     
  
—
 
JG



James Gould
Distinguished Engineer
jgould@Verisign.com

703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190

VerisignInc.com <http://verisigninc.com/> 

On 5/23/17, 4:58 AM, "regext on behalf of Antoin Verschuren" <regext-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of ietf@antoin.nl> wrote:

    Op 22 mei 2017, om 17:35 heeft Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenbeck@verisign.com> het volgende geschreven:
    
    > I support the proposed changes. One minor note:
    
    Thank you Scott,
    
    >> draft-gould-change-poll (change to draft-ietf-regext-change-poll)
    >>   Needs more reviewers and implementation.
    > 
    > Implementation isn't a requirement for WG adoption or publications as a Proposed Standard. As long as "needs ... implementation" means "nice to note if it exists", OK.
    
    You’re right, but this was the comment made by the authors on what they still wanted to do before the document was ready for WGLC to set a date in our milestones.
    The document is already adopted by the WG, but it could do with more review and implementation experience beyond Verisign according to the authors.
    
    regards,
    
    
    - --
    Antoin Verschuren
    
    Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
    M: +31 6 37682392

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email