IETF Logo Mail Archive

[regext] News of draft-ellacott-historical-rdap?

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Tue, 28 November 2017 11:04 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D812127369; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 03:04:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ieWJ0ojuXsZK; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 03:04:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 985B31271DF; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 03:04:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 70C41282749; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 12:04:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 500) id 6B38028275B; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 12:04:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay01.prive.nic.fr (relay01.prive.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:15::11]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64ABF282749; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 12:04:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: from b12.nic.fr (b12.users.prive.nic.fr [10.10.86.133]) by relay01.prive.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A67642C581; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 12:04:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: by b12.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 57F9C40035; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 12:04:17 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 12:04:17 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: draft-ellacott-historical-rdap.authors@ietf.org
Cc: regext@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20171128110417.35ez2rvbpdvgnpi4@nic.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 9.2
X-Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-3-amd64 x86_64
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000001, version=1.2.2
X-PMX-Version: 6.0.0.2142326, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2017.11.28.110016
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/roP8LeK2oC4xr5Lti6CnmgAUeaE>
Subject: [regext] News of draft-ellacott-historical-rdap?
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 11:04:24 -0000

draft-ellacott-historical-rdap seems cool and already has running code
at APNIC. But it is also dangerous, since you can no longer erase data
(it is mentioned in the Sceurity Considerations section).

It was briefly discussed at IETF 99 in Prague
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/99/materials/minutes-99-regext/>
but nothing on the list, and it expires in one month. Is there still
some interest?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email