[regext] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapping-09: (with COMMENT)
Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 24 August 2020 19:30 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: regext@ietf.org
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1127A3A0A73; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:30:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapping@ietf.org, regext-chairs@ietf.org, regext@ietf.org, Scott Hollenbeck <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, shollenbeck@verisign.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.14.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Message-ID: <159829743704.11951.16778460331586195166@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:30:37 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/tmoKLAV6jhh2zp4JczjeWdr_jJE>
Subject: [regext] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapping-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 19:30:37 -0000
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapping-09: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapping/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for this document and the various XLS/CSV examples related to particular elements of the data model. ** Section 4.4. Per the use of SHA-256 as a checksum algorithm, what identifier should be used in the cksumAlg attribute? ** Section 4.4. I concur with the OPSDIR reviewer (Joe Clarke), it would seem like native support (in the format itself) for a more robust checksum algorithm would be desirable. ** Section 4.6.2.1. Per “The <rdeCsv:file> child element defines a reference to the CSV file name”, is any file path information permitted, or are do all referenced files in dump need to be unique? ** Section 5.8.1. Please add a normative reference to XPath ** Section 7. If one had a business model requiring that checksums be computed using SHA-384 (set @cksumAlg) or using 7z compression (set @compression), how would one specify that in the profile per the defined steps in this section – nothing needs to be extended (step 1, step 3) or <policy> doesn’t seem to support specifying a particular attribute (step 2), so would one hard-code that into a custom schema (step 4)? ** Editorial Nits - Section 9.1 Typo. s/Seperated/Separated/ - Section 11. Typos. A few repeated instances. s/section Section/Section/g
- [regext] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ie… Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
- Re: [regext] [Ext] Roman Danyliw's No Objection o… Gustavo Lozano
- Re: [regext] [Ext] Roman Danyliw's No Objection o… Roman Danyliw