Re: [regext] EPP evolution and the REGEXT charter

Mario Loffredo <mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it> Fri, 22 March 2024 13:33 UTC

Return-Path: <mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F38EAC1519A6 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 06:33:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.007
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.007 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iit.cnr.it
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oAJOpiHu3tzI for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 06:33:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx3.iit.cnr.it (mx3.iit.cnr.it [146.48.58.10]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AD57C1D61E8 for <regext@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 06:33:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx3.iit.cnr.it 05212600554
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iit.cnr.it; s=mx320231221; t=1711114410; bh=nLj+wo4rLfqHN85p/fl4x6OXZKp/QLk+aoU/ZEtcFtM=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=WvFOvSNSnt1Z9u22tWIDxraisHdnjgdPhsReJOWHi9qjkxeEuxW56f8++SG2wzdqx TL52/m4CbJCl4KZ4z9D+tHb00A3NO0otUVEXk6MYQedSAPPuK458ZJfDTrAZK22zHG o4yn4t4E4W2oR8ZQavEkEeIHy0y4AdfSkyIAG3cD2q4EGlaMXzbJUWeFcvNxXQ59/W 8hg3TC2ATBIVAWYOaYTS5eNzM4xFlgvVG/nUEL+nP4rY7M/P9pb407VBmU4exLtASD 8csy0A36HcbxfW9zFHlDC96PQMiGMcadRuJEAR3s//1rPULLerRnP8nfbzKRGPIlWl yEl5v7y3+E0Hw==
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx3.iit.cnr.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05212600554; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 14:33:30 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mx3.iit.cnr.it
Received: from mx3.iit.cnr.it ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx3.iit.cnr.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10028) with ESMTP id Ck2BPIoIP7mh; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 14:33:29 +0100 (CET)
X-Relay-Autenticated: yes
Message-ID: <2b14dd99-9c9e-429c-9329-f394943b805b@iit.cnr.it>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 14:28:33 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Language: it
To: "Gould, James" <jgould@verisign.com>, "andy@hxr.us" <andy@hxr.us>
Cc: "jasdips@arin.net" <jasdips@arin.net>, "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, "maarten.wullink@sidn.nl" <maarten.wullink@sidn.nl>, "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>
References: <8CA69CC0-D08D-420C-83C7-4A5B03D698B8@verisign.com> <a7b73d2bb3ec49b586230d8709424170@verisign.com> <LV3PR15MB6453A840D9C678809D94BB0EC9312@LV3PR15MB6453.namprd15.prod.outlook.com> <1f54547d-8fb1-4686-8a95-e9dcbe021d55@iit.cnr.it> <CAAQiQReqVY91FF2_r=0KfWKUzc5Nt4nBRvzaZO5ZxjWp4Oux4g@mail.gmail.com> <A7C9335D-F0E1-4F89-8C02-3D67359297EA@verisign.com>
From: Mario Loffredo <mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it>
In-Reply-To: <A7C9335D-F0E1-4F89-8C02-3D67359297EA@verisign.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/wN2Q_vV4aYgQqOvkWWzA5IT-WUM>
Subject: Re: [regext] EPP evolution and the REGEXT charter
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 13:33:39 -0000

Il 22/03/2024 13:01, Gould, James ha scritto:
> Andy,
>
> It's not a question of fairness, but a question of what is defined in EPP RFC 5730 as it comes to extensibility of EPP.  EPP RFC 5730 includes extensibility of transport, as reflected in Section 2.1.

This is what I meant to say with my previous post.

Mapping EPP over a new transport is compliant with RFC5730 because it's 
a kind of extension defined and allowed by that document itself. 
Otherwise I do wonder what would be the purpose of Section 2.1.

On the contrary, as expressed by many of us including me, REPP would be 
something different from EPP , hence it would require to recharter 
RegExt. Otherwise I wouldn't catch the purpose of the feedback provided 
by this WG about first EoH version

to require it to be fully compliant with RFC5730. And that version was 
really almost compliant with RFC5730.

Finally, I'd allso like to outline that some time ago I provided Maarten 
with a more comprehensive feedback about REPP on CENTR R&D list. It 
included the objections I have just raised here.

Am sure that I've always been fair.


Best,

Mario

>
-- 
Dott. Mario Loffredo
Senior Technologist
Technological Unit “Digital Innovation”
Institute of Informatics and Telematics (IIT)
National Research Council (CNR)
via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 PISA, Italy
Phone: +39.0503153497
Web: http://www.iit.cnr.it/mario.loffredo