[regext] draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration and characters representation

[Patrick Mevzek <[e-mail]>]

Hello,

This draft, by essence, needs and uses a lot of characters outside of ASCII and for these use the U+XXXX notation.

There is now however RFC7997 (The Use of Non-ASCII Characters in RFCs) and among other things it says:

- the encoding of future RFCs will be in UTF-8
- Where the use of non-ASCII characters is purely part of an example
   and not otherwise required for correct protocol operation, escaping
   the non-ASCII character is not required.
- The RFC Editor encourages the use of the U+ notation except within a
   code component where one must follow the rules of the programming
   language in which the code is being written.


So maybe the XML examples could be rewritten by using the native unicode characters
instead of the U+ notation, as I believe it would make them far more understandable.

In the text, the other recommendations of the above RFC could be applied to have
more standardized handling.

-- 
  Patrick Mevzek
  [e-mail]