IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [renum] New Version of draft-liu-6renum-gap-analysis-01.txt

Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Wed, 13 July 2011 15:55 UTC

Return-Path: <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: renum@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: renum@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 396AC21F8906 for <renum@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 08:55:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, MANGLED_TOOL=2.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NDsMcy55X+HE for <renum@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 08:54:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9D3911E8146 for <renum@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 08:54:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p6DFslYg003162 for <renum@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:54:47 +0100
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk p6DFslYg003162
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=ecs.soton.ac.uk; s=200903; t=1310572487; bh=txWTe1JMKS4rFm0zX/ZsKF8cG7I=; h=References:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:From:Subject:Date:To; b=Gx740Zju1CFj/wxFfCO5HuCMjQ/QeKscMBZxRf8aUA4fvn1Jl3Y4TAcLhefWOiXFV gV7SArBIyltDDuFer+j/qOXC/Q9GhBKo2EeBlyW57HX3lA3prTeyOOO7zNy1//l1Ls eaMwdOjgTmF7jxP4ChWbIYn7l3jLKqfHFa3pMis8=
Received: from gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102::25d]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) envelope-from <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> with ESMTP id n6CGsl0366125801HF ret-id none; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:54:47 +0100
Received: from [IPv6:2001:630:d0:f111:216:cbff:fe8b:752e] ([IPv6:2001:630:d0:f111:216:cbff:fe8b:752e]) by gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p6DFsiCk012549 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <renum@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:54:45 +0100
References: <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F4502193737@szxeml509-mbx.china.huawei.com> <394FD5BE-3CB3-4E36-AE9C-5BD746AC90D7@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F4502193737@szxeml509-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-ID: <EMEW3|9b671b4665ef4701830605afe0cf8c26n6CGsl03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|394FD5BE-3CB3-4E36-AE9C-5BD746AC90D7@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:54:44 +0100
To: renum@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-smtpf-Report: sid=n6CGsl036612580100; tid=n6CGsl0366125801HF; client=relay,ipv6; mail=; rcpt=; nrcpt=1:0; fails=0
X-ECS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ECS-MailScanner-ID: p6DFslYg003162
X-ECS-MailScanner-From: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [renum] New Version of draft-liu-6renum-gap-analysis-01.txt
X-BeenThere: renum@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Renumbering discussion mailing list." <renum.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/renum>, <mailto:renum-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/renum>
List-Post: <mailto:renum@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:renum-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/renum>, <mailto:renum-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:55:00 -0000

Many thanks for this update Bing,

I would encourage comments and questions prior to the session at Quebec.   Any open issues can then be discussed there.

In general, are the two documents heading in the right direction for WG adoption?  If not, why not?

Tim

On 12 Jul 2011, at 03:00, Leo Liu(bing) wrote:

> Hi, all
> 
> The gap analysis has been updated to 01 version:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-liu-6renum-gap-analysis-01
> 
> main changes:
> 1. In section 5 "Address Configuration gap analysis", section 5.1 "host address configuration" was reorganized, some gap analysis was added
> 2. In section 6 "Address relevant entries update gap analysis", inserted a new section 6.2 "In-host server address update", to introduce the update of server addresses stored in hosts. 
> 3. reorganized section 7 "Renumbering event management" into 3 sub-clauses as "Renumbering notification", "Synchronization Management", and "Renumbering monitoring"
> 
> Your comments are expected eagerly.
> 
> B.R.
> Bing
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] 
> Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 9:00 PM
> To: Leo Liu(bing)
> Cc: Leo Liu(bing); Jiangsheng
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-liu-6renum-gap-analysis-01.txt
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-liu-6renum-gap-analysis-01.txt has been successfully submitted by Bing Liu and posted to the IETF repository.
> 
> Filename:	 draft-liu-6renum-gap-analysis
> Revision:	 01
> Title:		 IPv6 Site Renumbering Gap Analysis
> Creation date:	 2011-07-11
> WG ID:		 Individual Submission
> Number of pages: 18
> 
> Abstract:
>   This document briefly introduces the existing mechanisms could be
>   utilized by IPv6 site renumbering and envisions the effort could be
>   done. This document tries to cover the most explicit issues and
>   requirements of IPv6 renumbering. Through the gap analysis, the
>   document provides a basis for future work to identify and develop
>   solutions or to stimulate such development as appropriate. The gap
>   analysis is presented following a renumbering event procedure clue.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
> _______________________________________________
> renum mailing list
> renum@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/renum

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email