IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [renum] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis-03.txt

RJ Atkinson <rja.lists@gmail.com> Thu, 20 September 2012 11:30 UTC

Return-Path: <rja.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: renum@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: renum@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2821A21F8793 for <renum@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 04:30:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GxNFRuRJMSuP for <renum@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 04:30:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-f44.google.com (mail-qa0-f44.google.com [209.85.216.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6B921F8694 for <renum@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 04:30:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qaec10 with SMTP id c10so287406qae.10 for <renum@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 04:30:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=URnYZ60qjFqj0cpcAAbjtdmv3adjs4YQwIbQYjy6MMA=; b=TdV4Mxo1dqHXvqM/+U0ygBL9jTphz4nT61lgjhPGxHXnq/QB2OXq2Lmg1aJWF6Np18 n127ZkZmkffjRIU5+rOFRnXxLWwMG6j25OHz8FceC6ANxc4RgHjvb5zH125lrVgQMg/w tjVDIVxHSlg37O8s1dRiGHriw4FvERgNt8v2kjDj9AUr7Jm0eE0Suz/nGrKPu1Ihl36q 0U2l33rMw6ULmEnDXpDw8LxL9yEl0Bzfdv2VUlInyWZbF+oVQku41vAipsr85lKI/a1D 5E7At79FuFUIoggbPrwIBD2XFsLqO+X85WpsgFLkLtx2++dz3UIoaAgym8zW+AfWukg8 si+g==
Received: by 10.224.184.197 with SMTP id cl5mr4066675qab.28.1348140616562; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 04:30:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.30.20.13] (pool-74-110-100-136.nrflva.fios.verizon.net. [74.110.100.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m4sm7851913qak.6.2012.09.20.04.30.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 20 Sep 2012 04:30:14 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
From: RJ Atkinson <rja.lists@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F452935720A@szxeml509-mbs>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 07:30:13 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E2FEB233-3206-4E6C-B54D-BA832B545009@gmail.com>
References: <07A9B495-21EA-4DFD-84BC-AF5BB6B62BE2@gmail.com> <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F452935720A@szxeml509-mbs>
To: renum@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Subject: Re: [renum] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis-03.txt
X-BeenThere: renum@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Renumbering discussion mailing list." <renum.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/renum>, <mailto:renum-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/renum>
List-Post: <mailto:renum@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:renum-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/renum>, <mailto:renum-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:30:18 -0000

On 19  Sep 2012, at 22:22 , Liubing (Leo) wrote:
> But I think what Di and Marc argued is that,
> they might found in their cases, the FQDN ability
> was not easy to enable, which may caused by various deployment/implementation issues.

It really is very easy to enable in products from
multiple vendors (e.g. Netscreen, Cisco, Juniper).

In any case, both "ease of use" and "user interface"
are outside the usual scope of the IETF.

The big issue appears to be that folks don't realise
why using FQDN is better than IP addresses -- which
is why RFC 5887 talked about this.

Yours,

Ran

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email