Re: [Revampers] www.ietf.org website revamp community review committee - 20170627 - notes

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Fri, 30 June 2017 01:59 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: revampers@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: revampers@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7C6D129C1E for <revampers@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 18:59:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=BRdarFcq; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=p6I2HTUA
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ur-F-CG5x3s1 for <revampers@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 18:59:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 790A4124D68 for <revampers@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 18:59:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C53EE20E9C; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 21:59:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 29 Jun 2017 21:59:41 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=ad7grE60npttGnaVLK qAt4J6wsIwJVuHouoIac4gtps=; b=BRdarFcqH3ORBQDAzx1BND1bjHd5XTAwVX r8TpB/XU0S+XS+jwnrOarOu2BziIIKds92ToBJVlBIQ8U5DiZly9Ku2PBhlG28DC 7mWOFi+JFl4tVJBHrzdmFUFsR5N73ZNSRvy2ItbTyejdCWyYvzPsvixmRfelO7AT e8QF3Oj2wGvEjolmw5sWW0GUkEzE4/Ul2SKiZMwMAG7kqOmQI0h0WHKjNb0C4fyp Xq7Xb9wkP/+XM6GqCU5cID/xqSjijxLKX4mQyr7Pov/2gAz46POVTL7aZujc/EZ3 PrhoV7O8IXL3O9MzLtrWt6I8/hizQaNfGLPKjXXQ2aS6thEQHhjQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; bh=ad7grE60npttGnaVLKqAt4J6wsIwJVuHouoIac4gtps=; b=p6I2HTUA gh2Qu1Bdluzs0QrcRztmzdPqRo+TrtfbOGL7B8TOrt/YURRrTezzj5AHwR/sLrwi awqvkG04X5vJ6E66v0OeBhKV+Op+XbEjYHLZxU7KE/WmuKfBShb3arVJdGBb1Ex9 PVFh88p0VIKfB2Avk906r66WQUvF/1f0R9pWOKKwS8XBQZsgSsLjL5jieYDHw+W7 yRbU6Pa8HgYH1ziC/839ecyJyT0ApCzfvuo7mynbIsnoIaEu1SnKWnBZnkxxm8IV lqdeNj/NflhD109lD9eKlZYjo7ZlYQMYoxuZJVb6lTRhKc/KSyhpwDIico6PARX+ PJFZTIQoSc322g==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:jbBVWZ2AQUY35jrv0IIAsVf2LD2_7pmHDz5xx9Kf1cvkb3Dwj7aR5Q>
X-Sasl-enc: r81HEQGrM3fET57YeICjMEMp8h6gPafO8gGw3hCqxPlN 1498787981
Received: from [192.168.1.18] (cpe-124-188-19-231.hdbq1.win.bigpond.net.au [124.188.19.231]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5FC197E46B; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 21:59:40 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <BDAC6D8F-2139-4C7F-8268-C5F26DCA705C@vigilsec.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 11:59:36 +1000
Cc: Greg Wood <wood@isoc.org>, revampers@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <953AEE0D-18BB-4AB4-9F4C-8A3AFE9295BF@mnot.net>
References: <4CB144F7-2CA6-4250-A66E-A9A0FE8396E5@isoc.org> <4F62D505-F54E-45C2-8EA1-11A1AFA58B86@mnot.net> <0AA60C69-E712-4921-81A7-B539A8AD8BA5@vigilsec.com> <95CE8AAD-50F5-46B2-9EDE-6B4F6C44D7EE@mnot.net> <BDAC6D8F-2139-4C7F-8268-C5F26DCA705C@vigilsec.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/revampers/SsCJj3s6WXBnls0kMi_qpB__M4c>
Subject: Re: [Revampers] www.ietf.org website revamp community review committee - 20170627 - notes
X-BeenThere: revampers@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A discussion list for the IETF community review committee for the public-facing IETF website revamp project." <revampers.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/revampers>, <mailto:revampers-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/revampers/>
List-Post: <mailto:revampers@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:revampers-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/revampers>, <mailto:revampers-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 01:59:46 -0000

Ah.

Looking at the two pages, the following are missing:

- Link to the "home" page for the upcoming meeting
- Links to the various mailing list directories
- E-mail list archive search

And a few other bits and bobs. Really, just having a prominent link to the upcoming meeting "home" page should do the trick.

Cheers,


P.S. I think the datatracker sidebar is an abomination, and have turned it off; I only use the top links.



> On 30 Jun 2017, at 12:47 am, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> 
> Mark:
> 
> You believe that many IETFers will make the datatracker page their starting point for the IETF site.  So, what from the current from page ought to be added to the datatracker sidebar or the things across the top of the datatracker page to make their life easier?
> 
> Russ
> 
> 
>> On Jun 29, 2017, at 2:10 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Russ,
>> 
>> Sorry, not sure what that's in reference to.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> 
>>> On 29 Jun 2017, at 5:14 am, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Mark:
>>> 
>>> Are you suggesting things for the datatracker sidebar or for the items across the top?
>>> 
>>> Russ
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Jun 27, 2017, at 10:01 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Regarding the "tools" / "sidebar" issue -- I think that it's likely that active IETF participants are going to migrate to using datatracker as their "home" page, and that's fine.
>>>> 
>>>> It does mean that datatracker needs to be improved to suit that purpose; adding a few links in appropriate places should do the trick (and I note that there's a LOT of whitespace on the datatracker front page :).
>>>> 
>>>> If that's coordinated with the tools folks, it could be ready by 99, and doing so might reduce the amount of concern / complaints about the new site. We could also drop the extra "tools" menu.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Otherwise, just a few nits:
>>>> 
>>>> * "Understanding our documents" on the front page should probably be something like "Understanding the IETF"
>>>> 
>>>> * The IETF logo looks out of place in a white box on the banner; can we get a transparent-background version with the type reversed? It might require using a different background colour for the banner.
>>>> 
>>>> * The top navigation doesn't seem particularly well organised; there seems to be some duplication and awkward categorisations. E.g., many of the entries under "Internet Standards" would fit equally well under "How we work" as well as "about" -- this is confusing.
>>>> 
>>>> * There seems to be a non-existant "Making the Internet work better" page in the bread crumbs.
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On 28 Jun 2017, at 5:35 am, Greg Wood <wood@isoc.org> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Here is a link to folder with the recording (MP4 of the video) from the conversation last week:
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://isoc.box.com/v/IETF-Website-CRC-201706
>>>>> 
>>>>> Notes are also below. Please let me know if I have missed anything or there are any questions.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Here are a few highlights:
>>>>> 
>>>>> • Send notes from the call around (and the recording) to spark input/questions <—THIS NOTE
>>>>> • Suggestions about specific individuals to review the beta site<—ENCOURAGED!
>>>>> • Plan to release beta.ietf.org ~8 July (before IETF 99)
>>>>> • Check-in with Revampers after IETF 99/before production <—LIKELY FIRST WEEK OF AUGUST
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>> 
>>>>> -Greg
>>>>> 
>>>>> NOTES
>>>>> 
>>>>> 0. Agenda bash
>>>>> 
>>>>> 1. Introduction
>>>>> Community Review Committee == Revampers
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2. Review of project process and progress
>>>>> 	• So far...
>>>>> 	• SOW development
>>>>> 	• Input from interviews with audiences (participants, potential participants, non-participants)
>>>>> 	• Review by CRC and community 
>>>>> 	• Preview for community at IETF 98 (including update at the WG Chairs meeting)
>>>>> 
>>>>> b) Currently.
>>>>> 	• finishing content, working with content review groups (EMO Directorate (nee EDU-Team), IESG, Secretariat
>>>>> 	• Fixing bugs and implementing features with Torchbox
>>>>> 	• Testing with groups (non-participants, potential participants)
>>>>> 
>>>>> c) Upcoming
>>>>> 	• Review by IESG and IAB
>>>>> 	• Planning for community “beta” preview to be released around 8 July--in advance of IETF99
>>>>> 	• “Office hours” to be held at IETF 99 (similar to IETF 98) and update at the WG Chairs meeting
>>>>> 	• Public release on the schedule for early August
>>>>> 
>>>>> 3. Review/tour of revamped website
>>>>> https://beta.ietf.org 
>>>>> ietfwagtail / ietfshowme
>>>>> 
>>>>> 	• Responsive mode
>>>>> 	• Blog posts
>>>>> 	• Meetings
>>>>> 	• Quick links for current IETF participants
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 4. Discussion
>>>>> 
>>>>> Requesting CRC input:
>>>>> 	• How to test/confirm technical requirements from SOW including:
>>>>> 		• HTML/Open standards
>>>>> 		• Plug-ins and Javascript
>>>>> 		• Accessibility
>>>>> 		• Responsive design
>>>>> 		• SOW: https://iaoc.ietf.org/documents/IETF-Website-SOW-20140604-Final.pdf 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 	• Suggestions about IETF community review process
>>>>> 		• Including suggestions about specific individuals to review
>>>>> 
>>>>> 	• Next steps on website review development
>>>>> 
>>>>> Comment: Need a new name for the Tools “quick links” tab
>>>>> 	• Suggestion “Popular” instead of “Tools” for the name
>>>>> 
>>>>> 5. AOB/Next steps
>>>>> 	• Send notes from the call around (and the recording) to spark further input
>>>>> 	• Check-in with Revampers after IETF 99/before production
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Revampers mailing list
>>>>> Revampers@ietf.org
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/revampers
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Revampers mailing list
>>>> Revampers@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/revampers
>>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Revampers mailing list
> Revampers@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/revampers

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/