[rfc-dist] BCP 219, RFC 9499 on DNS Terminology
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Thu, 21 March 2024 07:37 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D18EDC14F736; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:37:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.659
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.659 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qx2cuYabTNE4; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:36:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfcpa.amsl.com [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DD9DC14F706; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:36:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 81A5ACE3DE; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:36:59 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, dnsop@ietf.org
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240321073659.81A5ACE3DE@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:36:59 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-dist/06hNJcXL3DLx-l5i7h_uFkdrC6U>
Subject: [rfc-dist] BCP 219, RFC 9499 on DNS Terminology
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 07:37:03 -0000
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
BCP 219
RFC 9499
Title: DNS Terminology
Author: P. Hoffman,
K. Fujiwara
Status: Best Current Practice
Stream: IETF
Date: March 2024
Mailbox: paul.hoffman@icann.org,
fujiwara@jprs.co.jp
Pages: 45
Obsoletes: RFC 8499
Updates: RFC 2308
See Also: BCP 219
I-D Tag: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis-10.txt
URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9499
DOI: 10.17487/RFC9499
The Domain Name System (DNS) is defined in literally dozens of
different RFCs. The terminology used by implementers and developers
of DNS protocols, and by operators of DNS systems, has changed in the
decades since the DNS was first defined. This document gives current
definitions for many of the terms used in the DNS in a single
document.
This document updates RFC 2308 by clarifying the definitions of
"forwarder" and "QNAME". It obsoletes RFC 8499 by adding multiple
terms and clarifications. Comprehensive lists of changed and new
definitions can be found in Appendices A and B.
This document is a product of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group of the IETF.
BCP: This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the
Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk
Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.
The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC