[rfc-dist] RFC 9102 on TLS DNSSEC Chain Extension
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Thu, 12 August 2021 00:01 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 339033A2A26 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 17:01:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_SBL=0.5, URIBL_SBL_A=0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PrqiEj1ofbjJ for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 17:01:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 784923A2A2B for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 17:01:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21712F4071C; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 17:00:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 5DA0BF40722; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 17:00:33 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20210812000033.5DA0BF40722@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 17:00:33 -0700
Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 9102 on TLS DNSSEC Chain Extension
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-dist <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 9102
Title: TLS DNSSEC Chain Extension
Author: V. Dukhovni,
S. Huque,
W. Toorop,
P. Wouters,
M. Shore
Status: Experimental
Stream: Independent
Date: August 2021
Mailbox: ietf-dane@dukhovni.org,
shuque@gmail.com,
willem@nlnetlabs.nl,
paul.wouters@aiven.io,
mshore@fastly.com
Pages: 43
Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None
I-D Tag: draft-dukhovni-tls-dnssec-chain-08.txt
URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9102
DOI: 10.17487/RFC9102
This document describes an experimental TLS extension for the in-band
transport of the complete set of records that can be validated by
DNSSEC and that are needed to perform DNS-Based Authentication of
Named Entities (DANE) of a TLS server. This extension obviates the
need to perform separate, out-of-band DNS lookups. When the
requisite DNS records do not exist, the extension conveys a
denial-of-existence proof that can be validated.
This experimental extension is developed outside the IETF and is
published here to guide implementation of the extension and to ensure
interoperability among implementations.
EXPERIMENTAL: This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the
Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any
kind. Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested.
Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk
Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.
The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC
_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org