[rfc-dist] RFC 9313 on Pros and Cons of IPv6 Transition Technologies for IPv4-as-a-Service (IPv4aaS)

rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Sat, 15 October 2022 04:50 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 371D9C1522B5; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 21:50:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.659
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.659 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qnOVbxCKzEXS; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 21:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79AD9C14CF19; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 21:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 408B855D49; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 21:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 9313 on Pros and Cons of IPv6 Transition Technologies for IPv4-as-a-Service (IPv4aaS)
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, v6ops@ietf.org
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20221015045044.408B855D49@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 21:50:44 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-dist/7PO-L_UlNguozEaiK7xRY546w_k>
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2022 04:50:50 -0000

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 9313

        Title:      Pros and Cons of IPv6 Transition Technologies
                    for IPv4-as-a-Service (IPv4aaS) 
        Author:     G. Lencse,
                    J. Palet Martinez,
                    L. Howard,
                    R. Patterson,
                    I. Farrer
        Status:     Informational
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       October 2022
        Mailbox:    lencse@hit.bme.hu,
                    jordi.palet@theipv6company.com,
                    lee@asgard.org,
                    richard.patterson@sky.uk,
                    ian.farrer@telekom.de
        Pages:      27
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-comparison-04.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9313

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC9313

Several IPv6 transition technologies have been developed to provide
customers with IPv4-as-a-Service (IPv4aaS) for ISPs with an IPv6-only
access and/or core network. These technologies have their advantages
and disadvantages. Depending on existing topology, skills, strategy,
and other preferences, one of these technologies may be the most
appropriate solution for a network operator.

This document examines the five most prominent IPv4aaS technologies
and considers a number of different aspects to provide network
operators with an easy-to-use reference to assist in selecting the
technology that best suits their needs.

This document is a product of the IPv6 Operations Working Group of the IETF.


INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community.
It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC