[rfc-dist] RFC 9198 on Advanced Unidirectional Route Assessment (AURA)
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Mon, 23 May 2022 19:25 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA617C2BCDF7; Mon, 23 May 2022 12:25:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1653333920; bh=LCJoSQ5ZhjHKkU//xzjUbiTmMPKsgKsvIRn/eO68YxA=; h=To:From:Cc:Date:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=O2OHew50ecZ9brJ8CmhngvzkBDyl2r9OnfUWGgH3RGVKtApkhB4rQZ32jbyLLak+7 /9VPVql0zvYd3KScR1S99iPhV675lJpJb9kKzghhGkFG6nLifuRotwLWFYBJ1brxuY aiFDaF1ubDUoo+ZzupjSr55etJYRd+nnsB7bVpBg=
X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Mon May 23 12:25:20 2022
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F469C2B71C0; Mon, 23 May 2022 12:25:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1653333920; bh=LCJoSQ5ZhjHKkU//xzjUbiTmMPKsgKsvIRn/eO68YxA=; h=To:From:Cc:Date:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=O2OHew50ecZ9brJ8CmhngvzkBDyl2r9OnfUWGgH3RGVKtApkhB4rQZ32jbyLLak+7 /9VPVql0zvYd3KScR1S99iPhV675lJpJb9kKzghhGkFG6nLifuRotwLWFYBJ1brxuY aiFDaF1ubDUoo+ZzupjSr55etJYRd+nnsB7bVpBg=
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD8EC15AE07; Mon, 23 May 2022 12:25:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XdxMEKoC3YqU; Mon, 23 May 2022 12:25:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B0E2C15AE08; Mon, 23 May 2022 12:25:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 3B81DD8454; Mon, 23 May 2022 12:25:08 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, ippm@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20220523192508.3B81DD8454@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 12:25:08 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-dist/BtaVeD06V3jz-07KHwnCjrh6u3o>
Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 9198 on Advanced Unidirectional Route Assessment (AURA)
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-dist <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 9198 Title: Advanced Unidirectional Route Assessment (AURA) Author: J. Alvarez-Hamelin, A. Morton, J. Fabini, C. Pignataro, R. Geib Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: May 2022 Mailbox: ihameli@cnet.fi.uba.ar, acm@research.att.com, joachim.fabini@tuwien.ac.at, cpignata@cisco.com, Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de Pages: 23 Updates: RFC 2330 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-ippm-route-10.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9198 DOI: 10.17487/RFC9198 This memo introduces an advanced unidirectional route assessment (AURA) metric and associated measurement methodology based on the IP Performance Metrics (IPPM) framework (RFC 2330). This memo updates RFC 2330 in the areas of path-related terminology and path description, primarily to include the possibility of parallel subpaths between a given Source and Destination pair, owing to the presence of multipath technologies. This document is a product of the IP Performance Measurement Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org