[rfc-dist] RFC 8794 on Extensible Binary Meta Language

rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Wed, 22 July 2020 18:13 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99E0D3A0908 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 11:13:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 58t8JrvqIkJ3 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 11:13:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FAD53A0916 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 11:13:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BFD1F4075D; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 11:12:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id C987EF40757; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 11:12:57 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20200722181257.C987EF40757@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 11:12:57 -0700
Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8794 on Extensible Binary Meta Language
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, cellar@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-dist <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8794

        Title:      Extensible Binary Meta Language 
        Author:     S. Lhomme,
                    D. Rice,
                    M. Bunkus
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       July 2020
        Mailbox:    slhomme@matroska.org, 
                    dave@dericed.com, 
                    moritz@bunkus.org
        Pages:      51
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-cellar-ebml-17.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8794

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8794

This document defines the Extensible Binary Meta Language (EBML)
format as a binary container format designed for audio/video storage.
EBML is designed as a binary equivalent to XML and uses a
storage-efficient approach to build nested Elements with identifiers,
lengths, and values. Similar to how an XML Schema defines the
structure and semantics of an XML Document, this document defines how
EBML Schemas are created to convey the semantics of an EBML Document.

This document is a product of the Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org