[rfc-dist] RFC 7982 on Measurement of Round-Trip Time and Fractional Loss Using Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN)
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Thu, 22 September 2016 05:00 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C3C912BFC8 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 22:00:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.918
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.918 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.316, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hOqUHWDVm-HQ for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 22:00:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E95512BFEF for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 22:00:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1EF3B80C47; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 22:00:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id BFFBBB80C3E; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 22:00:41 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20160922050041.BFFBBB80C3E@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 22:00:41 -0700
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, tram@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 7982 on Measurement of Round-Trip Time and Fractional Loss Using Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN)
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-dist <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 7982 Title: Measurement of Round-Trip Time and Fractional Loss Using Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Author: P. Martinsen, T. Reddy, D. Wing, V. Singh Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: September 2016 Mailbox: palmarti@cisco.com, tireddy@cisco.com, dwing-ietf@fuggles.com, varun@callstats.io Pages: 10 Characters: 19893 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-tram-stun-path-data-05.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7982 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17487/RFC7982 A host with multiple interfaces needs to choose the best interface for communication. Oftentimes, this decision is based on a static configuration and does not consider the path characteristics, which may affect the user experience. This document describes a mechanism for an endpoint to measure the path characteristics fractional loss and RTT using Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) messages. This document is a product of the TURN Revised and Modernized Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org