[rfc-dist] RFC 9193 on Sensor Measurement Lists (SenML) Fields for Indicating Data Value Content-Format
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Wed, 08 June 2022 00:07 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9149DC05926C; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 17:07:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1654646843; bh=5TXvLT39t/p9RkVDOEwcOZhyG7omvUKNscnuEWYf2ck=; h=To:From:Cc:Date:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=CcC+9ZnQsZxkEcqOaFnyIwHKLVAKCScCC1WmzXZUuiKHlPAjx5TgXDM1/4q1d7W0x zMB39Ax6nhl1nsRkVdiQIrKwP9ugH6dApvWXy5AVThaiRpn+WCWKSadysFkDVA9gXN BZzWx7vKVdMAKEQi9Q41peduZTdxZxwC5NiEAlr8=
X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Tue Jun 7 17:07:23 2022
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A538C0713FB; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 17:07:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1654646842; bh=5TXvLT39t/p9RkVDOEwcOZhyG7omvUKNscnuEWYf2ck=; h=To:From:Cc:Date:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=VsKJS3EEGJMp6S207YDtVqg4oufuCyp1stlzlj4iRSYYbiWY/EzsBNvha4ZWITbUy Tdlmkc/spvMnia6dNFOPWUJo9747m/HWJ7K0lGKxJW5k2HFAwx7SE71JQL/mVQhdPK qlmkKbYTS2lBRipf+T0o+hblzcZ0wcjDqI36eoIk=
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42B94C1527AF; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 17:07:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.656
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.656 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CTE_8BIT_MISMATCH=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VHtT6bt2SAuO; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 17:07:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F3ECC157B39; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 17:07:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 90B3DEEA08; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 17:07:11 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, core@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20220608000711.90B3DEEA08@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2022 17:07:11 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-dist/YufwCFCwDcxSAzAjLKFke6iA4Es>
Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 9193 on Sensor Measurement Lists (SenML) Fields for Indicating Data Value Content-Format
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-dist <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 9193
Title: Sensor Measurement Lists (SenML) Fields
for Indicating Data Value Content-Format
Author: A. Keränen,
C. Bormann
Status: Standards Track
Stream: IETF
Date: June 2022
Mailbox: ari.keranen@ericsson.com,
cabo@tzi.org
Pages: 10
Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None
I-D Tag: draft-ietf-core-senml-data-ct-07.txt
URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9193
DOI: 10.17487/RFC9193
The Sensor Measurement Lists (SenML) media types support multiple
types of values, from numbers to text strings and arbitrary binary
Data Values. In order to facilitate processing of binary Data Values,
this document specifies a pair of new SenML fields for indicating the
content format of those binary Data Values, i.e., their Internet
media type, including parameters as well as any content codings
applied.
This document is a product of the Constrained RESTful Environments Working Group of the IETF.
This is now a Proposed Standard.
STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the
standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this
memo is unlimited.
This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk
Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.
The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC
_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org