[rfc-dist] RFC 8024 on Multi-Chassis Passive Optical Network (MC-PON) Protection in MPLS
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Wed, 30 November 2016 23:52 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1049D129C16 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 15:52:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -107.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-107.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AMJjF0xP1PNJ for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 15:52:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B72BF129BDE for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 15:52:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 652E2B808B9; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 15:52:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id E400EB808B5; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 15:52:04 -0800 (PST)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20161130235204.E400EB808B5@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 15:52:04 -0800
Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8024 on Multi-Chassis Passive Optical Network (MC-PON) Protection in MPLS
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, pals@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-dist <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 8024
Title: Multi-Chassis Passive Optical Network (MC-PON)
Protection in MPLS
Author: Y. Jiang, Ed.,
Y. Luo,
E. Mallette, Ed.,
Y. Shen,
W. Cheng
Status: Standards Track
Stream: IETF
Date: November 2016
Mailbox: jiangyuanlong@huawei.com,
dennis.luoyong@huawei.com,
edwin.mallette@gmail.com,
yshen@juniper.net,
chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com
Pages: 16
Characters: 33671
Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None
I-D Tag: draft-ietf-pals-mc-pon-05.txt
URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8024
DOI: 10.17487/RFC8024
Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) is being extended to the edge of
operator networks including the network access nodes. Separately,
network access nodes such as Passive Optical Network (PON) Optical
Line Terminations (OLTs) have evolved to support first-mile access
protection, where one or more physical OLTs provide first-mile
diversity to the customer edge. Multihoming support is needed on the
MPLS-enabled PON OLT to provide resiliency for provided services.
This document describes the Multi-Chassis PON (MC-PON) protection
architecture in MPLS and also specifies the Inter-Chassis
Communication Protocol (ICCP) extension to support it.
This document is a product of the Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services Working Group of the IETF.
This is now a Proposed Standard.
STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the
standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this
memo is unlimited.
This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk
Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.
The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC
_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org