[rfc-dist] RFC 9551 on Framework of Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) for Deterministic Networking (DetNet)

rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Tue, 12 March 2024 04:33 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C1F9C14F683; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 21:33:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.657
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.657 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jhvEKZzWiC_3; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 21:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfcpa.amsl.com [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F587C14F6AD; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 21:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 53480191A4A3; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 21:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, detnet@ietf.org
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240312043330.53480191A4A3@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 21:33:30 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-dist/df_ZXmsk92JOy_DbVbwoCfOcEnE>
Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 9551 on Framework of Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) for Deterministic Networking (DetNet)
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 04:33:34 -0000

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 9551

        Title:      Framework of Operations, Administration, and 
                    Maintenance (OAM) for Deterministic Networking (DetNet) 
        Author:     G. Mirsky,
                    F. Theoleyre,
                    G. Papadopoulos,
                    CJ. Bernardos,
                    B. Varga,
                    J. Farkas
        Status:     Informational
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       March 2024
        Mailbox:    gregimirsky@gmail.com,
                    fabrice.theoleyre@cnrs.fr,
                    georgios.papadopoulos@imt-atlantique.fr,
                    cjbc@it.uc3m.es,
                    balazs.a.varga@ericsson.com,
                    janos.farkas@ericsson.com
        Pages:      14
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-detnet-oam-framework-11.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9551

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC9551

Deterministic Networking (DetNet), as defined in RFC 8655, aims to
provide bounded end-to-end latency on top of the network
infrastructure, comprising both Layer 2 bridged and Layer 3 routed
segments.  This document's primary purpose is to detail the specific
requirements of the Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM)
recommended to maintain a deterministic network. The document will be
used in future work that defines the applicability of and extension
of OAM protocols for a deterministic network.  With the
implementation of the OAM framework in DetNet, an operator will have
a real-time view of the network infrastructure regarding the
network's ability to respect the Service Level Objective (SLO), such
as packet delay, delay variation, and packet-loss ratio, assigned to
each DetNet flow.

This document is a product of the Deterministic Networking Working Group of the IETF.


INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community.
It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC