[rfc-dist] RFC 9146 on Connection Identifier for DTLS 1.2

rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Fri, 18 March 2022 21:29 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B995A3A11D5 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 14:29:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k9jl7jfUSl9F for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 14:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B5313A11C9 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 14:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1811E1E64A; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 14:29:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 499) id 4EDC82B465; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 14:29:06 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, tls@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20220318212906.4EDC82B465@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 14:29:06 -0700
Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 9146 on Connection Identifier for DTLS 1.2
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-dist <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 9146

        Title:      Connection Identifier for DTLS 1.2 
        Author:     E. Rescorla, Ed.,
                    H. Tschofenig, Ed.,
                    T. Fossati,
                    A. Kraus
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       March 2022
        Mailbox:    ekr@rtfm.com,
                    hannes.tschofenig@arm.com,
                    thomas.fossati@arm.com,
                    achim.kraus@bosch.io
        Pages:      14
        Updates:    RFC 6347

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id-13.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9146

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC9146

This document specifies the Connection ID (CID) construct for the
Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) protocol version 1.2.

A CID is an identifier carried in the record layer header that gives
the recipient additional information for selecting the appropriate
security association. In "classical" DTLS, selecting a security
association of an incoming DTLS record is accomplished with the help
of the 5-tuple. If the source IP address and/or source port changes
during the lifetime of an ongoing DTLS session, then the receiver
will be unable to locate the correct security context.

The new ciphertext record format with the CID also provides content
type encryption and record layer padding.

This document updates RFC 6347.

This document is a product of the Transport Layer Security Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org